User talk:Neo139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, Neo139, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

However, Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks.

Again, welcome!  Emmett5 01:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

your review on Neurocomputational Speech Processing[edit]

Dear reviewer, Thank you for uncommenting Fig 1.! I now have also asked Prof. Frank Guenther for giving us permission for his DivaBlock.jpg, but I have still no answer. It would be advantageous for this wikipedia article to add Fig. 4 as soon as we can, since this figure is important for understanding the text concerning DIVA model. Thank you so far for your help! Bernd Kröger, Bkroeger (talk) 12:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkroeger (talkcontribs) 17:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Fear of the Dark (live) article[edit]


I would just like to tell you that I've made the said article in the headline a redirect to Fear of the Dark (song). I'm doing this because having two articles on the same thing isn't necessary. I asked on the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs prior to making the article and they said it's best to have only one article on the matter. — Prodigenous Zee -
Ohh, i'm sorry, i tought it was better to have an article for the album and other for the song. So Fear_of_the_Dark_(song) is ok, i will make other singles. Then someone can add information about the title-track of the single in the same article. Like Sanctuary. Neo139 21:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Infobox you made for the "Women in Uniform" article...[edit]


I see that you changed the old infobox for the "Women in Uniform" article and replaced it with a new one. Only problem here is that you used the wrong infobox. The infobox you used is for albums. Since you got that infobox from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums, didn't you think that it was for albums and not singles (sorry if this sounds rude, I'm not trying to be rude)? Anyway, the proper infobox that you should use is Template:Infobox_Single and the proper Wikiproject for singles is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs. :-) — Prodigenous Zee - 04:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC) ohh, sorry, i confused :S. Thanks for fixing it. I will pay attention from now on, on that thing. --Neo139 08:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Jimbo Wales/In many languages...[edit]

I noticed your addition of Visual Basic to User:Jimbo Wales/In many languages... and was wondering if you immediately removed it because it was causing display probelms with the chart? Anyway, I've fixed it. If you removed it for some other reason (e.g., it's not correct), feel free to remove it or make any necessary changes. --334 02:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC) yes, i removed it because the table crashed, im not expert with tables on wikipedia :S. Thanks for fixing it. --Neo139 02:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Moving pages[edit]

Here is a good tip for moving pages, like from Rhapsody (band) to Rhapsody of Fire: Use the "move" tab at the top of the page. This keeps the history of revisions to the page all in one place. I have tagged Rhapsody of Fire so that an administrator will do the merge. —Centrxtalk • 06:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the tip man, i will use it.--Neo139 15:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Manowar band.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Manowar band.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Rhapsody of Fire lineup[edit]

Nice work at the Rhapsody discography! Cristan 13:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks--Neo139 18:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Whoever added the skin flute player was apparently just trying to be funny. You might want to check what Urban Dictionary has to say about that particular instrument ;) Promonex 11:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the info, and the webpage :P I'm not native english speaker --Neo139 21:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

About Disambigation Fixer[edit]

Hi! I would like to help about that project but I am not online at home. I have internet access only at work so you can contact me and I will answer you as soon as possible but maybe you will wait for half of a day (or few days if you try to contact me on weekend). I have idea about language. We can use Visual Studio 2005 Express Edition becouse it is very good and free and allows language combination (C++, C#, VB). It also allows us to do GUI design very easy and to move some parts of program to dll so we can divide job. I have professional programming expirience (I am programmer) and can do parts of program by myself.

Sorry for bad English,

Jakiša Tomić 14:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the interensting in the project, but it seems someone had already created the tool time ago. Disambiguation fixer. I checked and tested the tool and it works perfectly. I will expand the article later and spread the tool. Thanks again for the help. --Neo139 23:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, so r u still looking for help in the project? I v seen the program, it's made in tcl, do u want to port it to another langage or you want to expand the current project (in tcl)? SuperAriel 18:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I have tested the program and fixed more than 150 links with it. It works perfectly, and i don't think it necessary a remake version. It would be helpful to expand the current article about the program and when it's ready, i will spread the program to all the people that help fixing Disambiguation links. Thanks for be interested in the project. --Neo139 02:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi! I received a message from you saying that you were looking for programmers for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer, though I ended up reading it somewhat late... Am I still in time to take part in it? Greetings, Talos_DS 16:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The project never started, i created the article asking for coders, and a guy show me that a similar program was already done, i download it, test it and it worked perfectly, so is not necesarry to make another tool. Thanks also your interest, if you can improve the article WikiProject Disambigation fixer i will thank you. --Neo139 19:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'll take a look at it and try to improve it! Talos_DS 03:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

FPC Candidate (Siberian tiger)[edit]

A comment was recently posted by Samsara on the Siberian tiger FPC. It concerned placing the image in another article (see the subpage for the exact comment). I have now added the image to the stretching article, so you may or may not consider changing your vote (this is just to inform you of the change). Thanks. --Tewy 00:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Good aplication of the image. :D --Neo139 04:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


I've reverted this image to an earlier version. This image is used on numerous talk pages, user pages, etc, and if a fair use image is uploaded in place of the free one, all those pages instantly violate fair use policy. I don't know what the purpose of the new image was, but it should be uploaded to a different filename so we won't have a fair use image outside articlespace. --Sam Blanning(talk) 00:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Ok--Neo139 10:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request[edit]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

About the edit[edit]

Just letting you know I didn't vandalize that page (don't remember what it was but you posted on my user talk), I only changed paragraf to paragraph. Camoflauge 22:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Rock music Wikiproject invitation[edit]

Hello WikiProject Metal member.
WikiProject Metal music is important in expanding encyclopedic coverage of the metal. It brings attention to the lesser-known bands, and significantly improves the quality of the famous ones. Five Featured articles and two formers is proof of that.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently resurrected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and embrace the links between metal and rock music in general.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 04:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made to Varg Vikernes[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Neo139! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair-use images reviewed[edit]

I have reviewed the remainder of your image uploads and found that several of them were also uploaded without a fair-use rationale. Please fix them. You can find the list of images you have uploaded or edited here. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darkmind, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Darkmind. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 18:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Metal music stub.png[edit]

Image:Metal music stub.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Metal music stub icon.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Metal music stub icon.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal[edit]

Hello Neo139, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you. Dio throwing Horns.jpg

Articles for deletion nomination of Land of Immortals[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Land of Immortals, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land of Immortals. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 15:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Eternal Glory[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Eternal Glory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Glory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 15:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tales From The Emerald Sword Saga (limited edition).jpg[edit]


Thank you for uploading File:Tales From The Emerald Sword Saga (limited edition).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

If you are going to use two, it really has to be carefully justified- the mere fact another cover exists doesn't mean you can use it. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


Wikipedia Rollback.svg

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Your Comment To My Talk Page Is In Error. Your Edit Summary Is In Error And Offensive.[edit]

You wrote on my User page “When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page.” A REASON WAS GIVEN IN THE EDIT SUMMARY. It says “User’s forty-plus edits are advertisement/promotion for a nostalgia convention.” His edits include a link to the Wikipage that is nothing but promotion of and advertising for a small nostalgia convention that looks to be about 4 years old, a Wiki-page without a single reference on it. Rather, it includes numerous updates of participants scheduled to appear and topics, plus a sole link - to the convention’s website where all this same information is presented, plus, of course, information on PAYING FOR TICKETS TO THE CONVENTION and that the PARTICIPANTS CHARGE SEPARETLY FOR THEIR SIGNATURES.

Of course, such conventions are just normal business, but Wikipedia is not the place to create interest in attending them by adding to the Wikipages of celebrities, movies and television shows that the participants attended a prior year’s convention or will be attending it later this month, or that the movie was discussed at a prior year’s convention, or will be discussed this month at the convention, etc. Of course, every one of these edits includes a link to the convention’s page on Wikipedia, which page is nothing more than an ADVERTISEMENT on Wikipedia and a LINK TO THE WEBPAGE TO BUY TICKETS.

You wrote in your edit summary, reverting my edit on Lee Meriwether, "edit by identified as vandalism to last revision by Yobot." My edit did was NOT vandalism. Further, in reading the page about Yobot, the word “vandalism” does not even appear. identifying vandalism is not listed as one of Yobot’s tasks. I would stop Yobot, but given that it was you, not Yobot, that erroneously believes that no edit summary for my edit exists, when ANYONE LOOKING CAN SEE THAT THERE IS AN EXPLANATION GIVEN IN THE EDIT SUMMARY, I do not see reason to blame a bot. Yobot did not write that there was no edit summary. Yobot did not write that my edit was vandalism. You wrote those words. (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Disco Pages[edit]

Hey Again,, I see and I think that guys are right, but, what about thousands of disco pages ? :D Most of them have this problem :( I will try to edit them... Thank you anyway ;) Nima1024 (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

If Guns Are Outlawed EP by Attack Attack![edit]

I'm here to inform you that I did not do test edits to If Guns Are Outlawed, Can We Use Swords? I simply made fixes. Caleb Shomo was not part of the band during the time of its release so I contributed by changing that info. What gave you the weird idea that I was test editing anyway? - (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkin Park discography[edit]

Hey, thanks for edit. Actually I like this way that certifications be small, but if you check, most of discography pages are not like this and written in normal size. Anyway thanks, you just put "< small>" tag? Nima1024 (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

--- EDIT: Yes, you are right. Thanks bro ;) Nima1024 (talk) 08:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

--- EDIT: Hey mate, I think we should "unink" certifications on this page, what do you think? cause every table has linked to certification. Another point is we should add small "(sales thresholds)" under certificate with its link and other certificate words don't need it. I am waiting for your answer. Nima1024 (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I replied on my talk page but also wanted to suggest that you also talk to any of the following editors regarding discographies and/or promoting lists to featured, as they are all very experienced (if you don't know them already): User:Mister sparky, User:Lil-unique1, User:Legolas2186, User:JohnFromPinckney. Meanwhile I'll look it over too. - eo (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

hey, thanks for asking :) but that was correct. the albums should not be linked again in the singles table. Mister sparky (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey there, I noticed that you and User:Iknow23 have done extensive work on the Linkin Park discography page. Today another editor has switched some countries around without any discussion and wanted to call your attention to this. I was hoping that he would use the article's Talk Page to bring together a consensus on his desired changes, but he chose not to.[1] Perhaps you two could work with him to discuss the replacement of JPN with CAN? - eo (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

You are very welcome - glad to know my review was helpful. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 16:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi! I've been wondering if we should replace the Italian singles chart with Switzerland (CHE), since Linkin Park have 20 charted singles on there compared to only five in Italy. Cathartica (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

When the article was in FLC process I was requested that the countries for charts should be the same across all the article. So I choose as preference albums charts to singles charts and Italy charted #1x3+#2 in albums. There is no consensus on this but if you see Switzerland charted good on albums replace ITA with CHE in all the article (Albums, EPs, Remixes, Singles,etc). Also the certifications should be only from countries in the chart list, so you will have to find the Swiss certs as well. Not sure if the effort is worth but if you want go ahead, you have my blessing lol--Neo139 (talk) 23:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Operation Payback[edit]

The edit wasn't a person opinion. [2]. Just thought I'd let you know. JV Smithy (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Do not remove the deletion tag without addressing the concern. Another one based on a FUR has been added. We do not need three fair-use images and if they are used for decoration over critical commentary is also a concern.Cptnono (talk) 22:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
I'll make sure to address this tonight and give you the available options. I completely understand and am even supportive of the attack but want to make sure any such inclusion is inline with the standards here. Cptnono (talk) 23:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Figured I would do this before I had too many refreshing beverages.

Option 1 would be the OTRS process. That would involve the creator of the image sending an email to the OTRS team saying they release it. This sounds like too much effort and problematic since 1)Do you know who actually created it or was it just posted on an imageboard. 2)The file summary would say who the author is and I assume they wish to stay anonymous.

Option 2 would be creating a fair use rationale for each image. This would be very similar to the FUR used in the lead's image. The roadblock to this is that it needs to be for critical commentary instead of illustrating the overall topic of the article (media used to further explain something discussed in the article vs defining the topic essentially). So right now, a FUR could easily be created for File:Operation Payback GMlegal.png since the attack on Gallant Macmillan is already explained. File:Operation Payback.png would need sourced lines discussing the RIAA. At first I had three concerns with this. 1) overuse of FUR: I was under the impression that this was frowned upon but I am not finding a policy or guideline saying that so screw it. 2) We do not want to appear to be promotional. That is debatable with these instances. 3)Space. We do have space to put them both in the history section(where the lines they improve upon should be) so that is no longer an issue.

So basically, if the RIAA can receive sourced line(s) I would be happy to tinker with some FURs and see if it works.Cptnono (talk) 02:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

As per your request, I've added a cite for the USCG = Dunlap and pals; the techdirt article flat out states it, and while the WHOIS records are quite blatant, they're not so easily cited. --moof (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Help with Operation_Payback please[edit]

Neo139, you have declined my comments and I can see that you provide valid reasons to do so...what I need to know then is how do I add: "There are also some who see Anonymous as a secret government group used to promote a government political agenda, as in this case the new proposed "digital Patriot Act" legislation being introduced and championed by Palin & Lieberman."

Or something similar to that page... What do I need to do so the above line is approved... in my opinion, that information is critically important in better understanding this whole deal... —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


You should not have done that. Now all of the images will have to be deleted. Common sense will not allow it without an author ( "Anonymous" was not the author since an individual within an illy-defined group was) and the Twitter link is no longer verifiable. The FURs were good but these images do not meet the criteria to be in commons. Can you provide an archived version of the page to snd to the OTRS team?Cptnono (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

The images were tagged for deletion but I think it was not because they failed to verify if Anonymous was the author, but because they contain logos, and other images (such as the Wikileaks logo, photo of Julian, Gene Simmons, etc) They used {{derivate}} tag. I have asked to the user that nominated them if removing that logos/photos is enough to keep the images on Commons. Thanks for telling me. I don't browse usually browse Commons. I will see what I can do. --Neo139 (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah... didn't realize. I need to look into it more to see if the logos within the images are a problem. Unfortunately, if it isn't OK on commons it isn't OK here but it does work the opposite sine a FUR is allowed here. Any images without logos of other parties should be acceptable at Wikipedia with the FUR. If I can find a good fix for the others I will. Of course, a couple less images might be for the best.Cptnono (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
The problem was the photos of people (diff), and not the logos. I have just removed them. So we are no problem now ^^ --Neo139 (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Universidad Católica Argentina[edit]

Hi. In es:Universidad Católica Argentina you did a reversion because someone did a large added of text with Ejemplo.jpg and was labelled as vandalism. The author talked to you reverse your action. Insteat, it was a copy/paste of a CR text. I deleted it and also the "wikificar" template, as the copy/paste, not format text is not longer there. Just for you to know, no critics or anything ;). Cheers. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 12:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)(PF):probably you will only find me in es:WP.

Tranquilo. Un saludo. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 00:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Nessa Devil. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Using IAFD to verify her real name is improper since IAFD does not verify whether an alias (AKA) is the real name. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Neo139. You have new messages at Morbidthoughts's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

you sir. are blind ignorant misimformed person[edit]

So are you actually serious?

I deleted a template saying that this article isnt notable enough and you are accusing me of vandalism?

Are you honestly serious? The attacking of websites by the anon group definately made it famous onto the mainstream news, including the attacking of and and they were going to attack PayPal too but they got scared and returned the money they owed to wikileaks, PayPal even ADMITTED this.

Instead of deleting the article I suggest merging it to Operation Payback, thats what a person with a brain would do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:5th November Operation Payback.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:5th November Operation Payback.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted articles[edit]

  • /subpage1 has Ricardo Fort. This one was a really short stub, I had to go back a ways to a version that had some real content.
  • /subpage2 has Kohana. Have fun! - eo (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

My talk page[edit]

Hi Neo139,

I just noticed you filled my talk page with a portal to various useful links on how to be part of the Wikipedia community. I appreciate the gesture, but can't help wondering: was one of my edit wrong in some way? I am just curious to know what prompted you to give me these hints.

Regards Olivier Diotte (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

None of your edits was wrong. In fact they were good :) I gave you this links so you can keep on with the good editing, learn more and edit more and better. There are lots of things to learn about editing. I have been here for a while and I still learn new things from time to time. Anyway, if you have any question just ask me ^^ --Neo139 (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Oh ok, thanks. I agree there are a lot of things to keep in mind when editing on Wikipedia to ensure consensus. Thanks for your help. Regards, Olivier Diotte (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Grete Stern[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Grete Stern, and it appears to include material copied directly from

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Grete Stern[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grete Stern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Baseball Watcher 02:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Grete Stern[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Grete Stern, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Timneu22[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Timneu22 has been moved to a new page, apparently it should not have been on the user's talk page, and the comments you made there removed to the talk page of the RFC. Please add any comments you with to make in appropriate form at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Timneu22. User:Fred Bauder Talk 03:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC) And how can you tell it is the real person anyone can add a userid on facebook also if facebook is reliable why isn't myspace Syxxpackid420 (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Ok that answers why facebook is a reliable source but why is myspace and youtube not reliable sources then Syxxpackid420 (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Diego Grez (talk) 21:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:The Beatles with Jimmy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Virgin Steele[edit]

Category:Virgin Steele, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 00:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I made you Template:Virgin Steele -- go ahead and populate it from the albums category. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
It seems that you overlooked this request, and the template nearly got deleted. In the end I did it for you. Happy New Year! – Fayenatic (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cannondiablo (talkcontribs) 12:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey[edit]


New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Neo139! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Your note on my talk page[edit]

Thanks Neo! Invertzoo (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited A. T. Cross Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Information (Berlin album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Crawford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

about the editing on linkin park[edit]

hey,,neo139 i just wanted to reply on your message that you sent it to me about LP'discography what you made is wrong and i wanted to fix it coz ...when you say that the album sold 9,637,000 that's right in 2000, but after that it sod more than 10,000,000 and it got the diamond certification from RIAA and that number reflect All the copies which has been sold in USA not just in what i did it's not wrong...and i hope you will make it right (10,000,000) yours sincerely....Brad LP (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

well.. thanks for these information and i hope you'll fix it as you said (9.897.067) i will be happy if you did that :)Brad LP (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

OK as you wish.......... (sadly) i hope there's no hard feelings :)Brad LP (talk) 14:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Through the Storm (Riot album).gif[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Through the Storm (Riot album).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).


  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Full disclosure (mailing list)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Full disclosure (mailing list) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this service meets the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Neo139. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Article Feedback/Feedback response guidelines.
Message added 12:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Relation of Kirchnerism with the press[edit]

Thanks for the innovative <!-- --> solution to the disputes at September 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina; I've done as you suggested and protected it. After I levied protection, I made a bunch of wording changes to make the English sound more natural, and while I was doing this I encountered our article on Relation of Kirchnerism with the press. Would you please suggest an alternate title for this article? The current title makes it sound as if Kirchnerism and the press are some sort of cousins. Something like "Relationship between K and the p" might be better, but I'm unfamiliar with the situation and have probably overlooked a better title. Nyttend (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Conflict between Kirchnerism and independent media it is; thank you. Nyttend (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


Sorry, I can´t. That article was deleted in DR and nothing has change since then. They´re not a formal political group and has no participation in any vote process. And "they will in 2013" is not enough (see es:WP:CRISTAL). When they participate and win some votes, it will be possible to review the situation of the article. Right now is not possible. And "exist in en:WP" is not a valid motivation as well (see es:WP:ESA). Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, that´s not possible neither. That´s the reason why I deleted Sageo's userpage. Also, it's very strange why you write an article in subuserpage of another user. Besides, you added 14000 bytes in one edit. That tells me that, or was an automatic translation (with Google or something) or the content was safe somewhere. Several of the source are the same PPL, wich is not independent of the subject are so are not valid sources. I can see it is an updated version of deleted one, with the same problems. For example, use this to justified their existence as political partie when that source only put them.... in the Table of Content, wich could be even considerated manipulation of the source. Funny is, english version was written by Mwalko, who wrote also the deleted es:version, wich has not edit since article was deleted, and only contributions are it, what makes me think in a SPA. Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
As I already explain, if they never took part on votes, and even worst, they never had a delegate anywere it is impossible to even think it notable. Referencies shows they "make noise", appearing here and there with different protest, but that doesn´t prove there're notables. Till they don´t have a real political presence, I don´t see chances of restore or rewrite article. If remains here, it's because rules are different, people didn´t check the article or nobody cares. Anyway, I see no reason to restore it, since lack of notability didn´t change, as I already explain. No votes are not something a couple of sources can change. Bye. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-officeconnect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for the compliment, I really appreciate it. The recent activity on the Todd La Torre page seems to have spawned some interest by other users even beyond me. I did ask a photographer to share some of his work (he did the same for Scott Rockenfield + 2 other pictures) but the other contributions from today came as a surprise even to me! Also, interesting to see two worlds coming together; you seem to be coming from the Crimson Glory side, and I'm at it from the Queensÿche side. Music unites! :-)

Also in return, thank you for welcoming the new members! Best wishes. --Eddyspeeder (talk) 20:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

LP, again !![edit]

OK here's the source for the 16M Here and it's very updated unlike the old one,,,

and for the 60M i tried to discuss it first and no one responded and the thing is that they're 50M even brfore releasing ATS and LT, and does the 50m includes the Live, Remix albums. so i see no reason to not add this numbers. hosam007 (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

i don't know !! it just didn't sound logical to me. they're not changing at all. but it's OK. the only thing made me change it that no one responded and i won't change it again
thank you-- hosam007 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

i don't know what to say, for matrix's neo's sake !!!!!!! why you always remove my edits is there's something wrong ???? hosam007 (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

i talk about LP discography and the NZ certifications and why they were removed by you !!! i searched the whole internet to find RS for the certifications and now you just remove them without any good reason !!!! hosam007 (talk) 14:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

it's right and reliable source and every main page use it such eminem disc. and coldplay too. it's singles certifications not albums. just leave it --hosam007 (talk) 17:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

thank you, i just was annoyed coz it wasted my work but now it's OK :)

regards-- hosam007 (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved[edit]

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved and ready[edit]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

    • Then go to
    • Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
    • Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
    • You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (Your account is now active for 1 year!).
  • If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at and, second, email along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
  • Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
  • Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Questia email failure: Will resend codes[edit]

Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Questia email success: Codes resent[edit]

Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi t | c 21:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in debate[edit]

Dear Neo139

Your recent posts suggest you might be interested by this ongoing argument.

Alfy32 (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexandra Larsson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexandra Larsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Larsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Technopat (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment[edit]

Hey Neo139; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Gnu Screen Screenshot.[edit]

Hi. I may be breaking rules by writing this here, but I can't find any other way to contact you.

It says that this is the picture of your authorship. I would like to know how you managed to separate splits with one character wide whitespace. In my system, splits are shown seamlessly side by side, which is, on the one hand, good because it gives more space, but, on the other hand, confusing.

Please contact me via email (same login on or in this page right here, I'll come and check once in a while. Kindaro (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

I think its Caption option that your are looking for. But its strange because its the default option that you want. So if you don't have ~/.screenrc and have the default /etc/screenrc, it should be working (I'm using everything default with Screen version 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 with Ubuntu 10.04.) Try asking at superuser, they are far more knowledgeable than me.--Neo139 (talk) 20:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Greek video - translation[edit]

00:11 - 00:25: We are seeking for answers concerning the policy of the government at country's Ministry of Economy. We have arranged an interview with the Minister of Economy, Hernán Lorenzino. We have many questions on the economic model of Kirchner's government.

02:10 - 02:17: However, after we pose this question, the interview stops right away with the excuse of his being tired and he says has to go.

02:30 - 02:32: While the microphones are still on, he says...

02:49 - 03:00: A bit later, when we turn on the camera again, the minister's assistant explains which was the real reason why the interview was interrupted.

I hope this helps. Feel free to ask for help in case you need anything else --Smiley green alien wink.svg Alien ? 14:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Linkin park total sales need to be changed[edit]

hi the sales figures for linkin park are rather outdated. Hybrid theory has been at 24mn for the past 5 years; meteora and minutes to midnight have a reference source that dates back to 2008;A thousand suns has a ref dated 2010 which is a very short while after the album was released . I am a new to wikipedia so i kindly request you to find suitable up to date references and update the truth in the respective pages Nihalmhn (talk) 04:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beto Vázquez Infinity may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Markus Prompt]] ([[Markus Prompt]])
  • * [ Web Official de Beto Vazquez Infinity en MySpace)]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update[edit]

Hey Neo139. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

Eurasian Eagle-Owl Maurice van Bruggen.JPG

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Invite to Corruption in Argentina[edit]

Greetings Neo139, I noticed that you edit a lot of pages related to politics in Argentina. I spent the better part of the last two months creating the page for Corruption in Argentina, and I think it needs a fresh pair of eyes. Any chance you might be able to help? DaltonCastle (talk) 20:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Saw you did some work on the page. Thanks for the fresh look.DaltonCastle (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina logo.png[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nessa Devil for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nessa Devil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nessa Devil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 09:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)