User talk:Tristessa de St Ange

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:NicholasTurnbull)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Pure Heroin mediation[edit]

Welcome back, Tristessa. Just thought I'd note a couple of observations about that mediation:

  • The filing editor hasn't edited WP since April 1 (at least not signed-in; there are a couple of IP edits on other articles which might be him), has only 34 total edits, and no email account registered. You might have to move forward without him, but there's at least one other active editor who took the same position, so that may be possible.
  • The discussion has moved on substantially at the article talk page with a number of additional editors joining in who weren't participating when the request was filed. There's not been any discussion, but a bit of editing in mainspace, on this point over a month, so there may not be a real or active dispute still pending. If there is a dispute, you might need to add some additional parties and get their consents.

Just thought you might like to know. Though I'm also a member of MedCom, I've not taken it because of potential bias on my part: I hate disputes about music genres and don't feel that I can bring anything to them. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj videography[edit]

Hi, I am currently in the nomination process of getting Nicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I was wondering whether you could take a look and possibly leave your thoughts/opposition/support for the nomination and leave any suggestions you may have to improve it. Thank you :) Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1 KaneZolanski (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Einstein[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Albert Einstein. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:GMMSF Box-Office Entertainment Awards. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dorje Shugden controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:Half-Life 3[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Draft talk:Half-Life 3. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Daniel Amen[edit]

Daniel Amen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Your attention is called to a Request for comment at Talk:Daniel_Amen#RFC: List of journal articles. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

RfM Schiller Institute[edit]

Hi TDSA, has there been any progress on the RfM? Looking at the case talk page, I see a great summary you added a couple of weeks ago, but nothing much since. It is a tough subject, I know. By all means email me if you want to discuss. Sunray (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

RfM Pure Heroine[edit]

On this one, I'm not seeing a response to your proposal from the participants. Is it worth contacting them again? I can do that if you want. It may have gone stale, but that's your call. Let me know if you want me to either contact them, or close the case. Sunray (talk) 01:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Free! (anime)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Free! (anime). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten (06) by Ron.jpg

Thank you very much for the work you did on the article T.B. Joshua back in 2008. I continued cleaning up all the references as they have been pretty much in the same state as they were in 2008. Many did not actually reference to anything related to the article and some were simply put there to make the article appear more neutral. Right now there is a heated discussion going on between me and one particular person who seems to be very interested in keeping this article as criticism-free as possible yet. I wouldn't call this an edit war yet but I would like to ask you to keep an eye on the article and its discussion. There seems to be a very heavy focus from at least one lobby group on it.

Gromobir (talk) 12:25, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Rubin (journalist)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Rubin (journalist). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Disappearance of Natalee Holloway[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Oathkeeper |Oathkeeper[edit]

There is an RfC at Oathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." The content dispute is longstanding and new voices are welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul LePage[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Paul LePage. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Need your opinion on Eliza Jane Scovill[edit]

Hi,

I posted a RfC on Talk:Eliza_Jane_Scovill#RfC a while ago, but aside from the two people involved in the dispute nobody else has commented. Since you're signed up for the feedback request service, can I ask for your opinion? Thanks. Banedon (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)[edit]

Hello! I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Mail[edit]

You've got email. — TransporterMan (TALK) 15:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Is it considered civil?[edit]

I doubt whether this is a correct way of commenting in talk pages. Note: ANI archived discussion. Mhhossein (talk) 18:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar Mama (song). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sophia Magdalena of Denmark[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sophia Magdalena of Denmark. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Doctor Who serials[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Doctor Who serials. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peyton Manning[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peyton Manning. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Superman[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Superman. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Sunni Islam[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Sunni Islam. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yisrael Katz (politician born 1955)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yisrael Katz (politician born 1955). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins[edit]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers[edit]

Hi Tristessa de St Ange.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Admin mop.PNG Administrator changes

Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirateSchwede66K6kaEaldgythFerretCyberpower678Mz7PrimefacDodger67
Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BriangottsJeremyABU Rob13

Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

Nuvola apps knewsticker.png Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux Talk 15:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

I wish to remain active --Tristessa (talk) 23:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Wish you did stick around... I remember you under the old username, and you were the greatest. Hopefully and presumably you have gone on to better things. Herostratus (talk) 02:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abraham[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abraham. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ned Kelly[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ned Kelly. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabolous[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fabolous. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shneur Odze[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shneur Odze. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

COVER[edit]

Dear Tristessa de St Ange, In recognition of your contibutions to Wikipedia I would like to invite you to become a representative of COVER, a Wikipedia support organisation for vulnerable editors. Please see the page Wikipedia:COVER organisation. Please leave an answer on my talk page.TomBarker23 (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stephen Paddock[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Paddock. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:His Dark Materials[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:His Dark Materials. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard Blumenthal[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard Blumenthal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Tristessa de St Ange. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emily Beecham[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Beecham. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)