If you require assistance, please click here.
- 1 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 2 Signpost exit poll
- 3 Today
- 4 GS E&C
- 5 Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed
- 6 MfD nomination of User:Nick/monobook.css
- 7 Thanks
- 8 Don't Take It Personally edit
- 9 Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Patience-Agbabi.jpg
- 10 Thank you for supporting my RfA
- 11 Hello
- 12 Orphaned non-free image File:Garden Bridge - London - Arup Image.jpg
- 13 Precious anniversary
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?
If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.
All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian
Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.
|quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes|
|the extended exit poll, estimated time required: depends|
Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).
|how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes|
Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry! :-)
We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 220.127.116.11, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. GamerPro64 14:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Nick. Back in March you deleted GS E&C which was created by violation copyrights. I think it would be better to redirect this page to GS Group, a parent company of GS E&C. However, it seems that the page creation is protected. Maybe you could create the redirect and protect the redirect then, if necessary? Thank you. Beagel (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed
You are receiving this message because you are a party or offered a preliminary statement and/or evidence in the Arbitration enforcement 2 case. This is a one-time message.
1.1) The Arbitration Committee confirms the sanctions imposed on Eric Corbett as a result of the Interactions at GGTF case, but mandates that all enforcement requests relating to them be filed at arbitration enforcement and be kept open for at least 24 hours.
3) For his breaches of the standards of conduct expected of editors and administrators, Black Kite is admonished.
6) The community is reminded that discretionary sanctions have been authorised for any page relating to or any edit about: (i) the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) any process or discussion relating to these topics, all broadly construed.
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed
MfD nomination of User:Nick/monobook.css
User:Nick/monobook.css, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nick/monobook.css and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nick/monobook.css during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:27, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Don't Take It Personally edit
Nick, thanks for your kind info, I've read the policy and understand, you will have seen the edits to my talk page over Christmas and realise how unacceptable that was, particularly the veiled threats, the problem is I have not had the best experience with support from admin and decided to track the offending editors down myself with a view to pass-on the details to admin in the new year, I now realise that the best thing is to just report it and wait for a response, regards. Twobells (talk) 14:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Update. A quick question, any reason why this  particular edit was reverted by you? I had already edited the section and removed that much earlier yet it was reverted and now someone called DrMargi is having a go at me, best wishes. Twobells (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php title=User_talk:Keri&diff=697291514&oldid=697213401
You are invited to join the discussion at commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Patience-Agbabi.jpg. I opened a DR on commons about this file, which you've previously removed from the article for the same reason I nominated it. :) Thanks. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 06:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA
|Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award|
|Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)|
Orphaned non-free image File:Garden Bridge - London - Arup Image.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Garden Bridge - London - Arup Image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
|... you were recipient
no. 531 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!