User talk:Niusereset

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 04:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Trust me, I was looking and searching stubs but I did not find what I was looking for. So I had two posibilities: to create stub for Kemetism or create some general neopaganistic stub. I choose the second one. And believe me I would rather use existed stub than cerating a new-one. But there was not what I needed. The closest was paganism stub, but paganism is not the same as neopaganism (eachone has here individual articles and whole individual cathegories).

If that stub will be considered as a mistake I will accept verdict. But at that moment I did what I considered as the best.

--Niusereset 25.VIII. MMVIII, 12:00 CEST


I wanted to offer my hand and welcome you here (even though you've been here a while), and specifically to thank-you for your help on one of my pet projects here, all things dealing with Kemetic religions. I look forward to working with you further in the future! If you ever have any questions or concerns about something I said or did, please do not feel hesitant to let me know or ask me a question. - IanCheesman (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for welcome :-)
--Niusereset 27.VIII. MMVIII, 11:25 CEST

Kemetist > Kemetic[edit]

Hi! I inform you that "Kemetist" is not widely used in English; the right word is "Kemetic/Kemetics". --Iho (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Please, can you move also the Czech and Slovak articles to the correct translation of "Kemetic" in those languages? I'm not able to do that. --Iho (talk) 16:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I can ensure you, that to use word Kemetic in any form in our languages would sound strange.
Therefore these articles will remain there where they are. But I will fix inter-wiki link for en-wiki.
--Niusereset 21.IX. MMVIII, 13:10 CEST


Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Magical objects in Harry Potter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.You are expected to signing your talk page contributions including the standard WP date/time stamp, via ~~~~ or ~~~~~. If you wish to also include your idiosyncratic dates and/or your home time zone with your sig, place it/them before the standard stamp. Removing or replacing the sig or date added by the bot is disruptive editing. Thank you.
--Jerzyt 08:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me about a year old thing . . . .
Niusereset —Preceding undated comment added 11:12, 30 May 2009 UTC.
  • AGF suggests you understand "better late than never", but are careless in letting your gratitude sound like irony.
    --Jerzyt 13:47, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I gotta admit it was an irony. I am using exactly this form of sig in both, czech and slovak wikis, and nobody has a problem. On the contrary I got a possitive reactions and question how I am making it. But you may calm down. I am not participating in discussions here anymore. Sometimes I do some editions in articles and there are no sigs.
May gods be with you . . . .

Linking to forums[edit]

Please don't add links to forums, see WP:ELNO. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


Hi, here you just award barnstars to deserving editors. Check out each barnstar's template/homepage for information concerning who they should be awarded to. Some barnstars are also awarded in WikiProjects. The WikiLove extension can help you to do this (see, it's that heart up top). If you need any more answers just post some more on my talk or here, i'd be really pleased to help! You can also see WikiProject Wikipedia Awards (i trust you already have) and this set of links for extra info :-) benzband (talk) 18:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I thought it is like that... I just wanted to be sure... in some ways it is here the same as on cs-wiki, but in some different and I was not sure how much differenet... As I wrote before, we have a lists of holders for most of our awards but here I did't find it, so I asked, if there is something else for that kind of purpose... I ques it is not.
I will wait with mine barnstaring for the pagan barnstar.
Niusereset (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Permian–Triassic extinction event[edit]

I've removed your recent addition to Permian–Triassic extinction event because it looked like original research to me. Then I thought - maybe there is something to this. If you have a reliable source which supports your addition, please provide it. The content you added may indeed have potential if supported with a reference and reworded a bit. If you have a source bring it to the talk page there - or explain here and I'll take a look and perhaps we can work it back in to the article. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Well... "on the other hand"... the supercontinent piece of the article is about how the existence of the supercontinent could affect the life both on land and in oceans... with the conclusion that the supercontinent by itself didn't have any negative direct affects on the life. The influence on the ocean currents were there disputed and the life on the land was on the contrary prospered at that time. So no direct affect on the life by the existence of one supercontinet. Therefore "on the other hand"...
The theory of masive subduction leading to masive eruption is not mine. It was mentioned and graphicly showed in the documentary film Miracle Planet - Extinction and Rebirth, this part of the documentary can be seen here on YouTube. Unfortunately the documentary was dividied into the parts in the middle of the "super-subduction" part and previous part of documentary is missing... there is presented the idea of that in this position of continets (supercontinent) is the subduction of the ocean floor on its maximum... and than it continue with the scene on the link. There is also mentioned Andrew Saunders from Leicester university, who by himself explained to the camera the proces of the ocean floor subduction and following preassure from the within of planet on the surface of land plates.
The word super-subduction is mine and I used it only here for short designation of the specific piece of the documentary.
About the rewording... I am not sure how to do it. English is not my native language and I did my best to express the idea at the first time.
Niusereset (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Ta Noutri[edit]

Hi, I'm sorry but I've nominated this for deletion. Had to - It's had a notability tag since 2008 and no sources. Sorry, don't like doing AfDs. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The Ta Noutri deletion discussion is here. I've also nominated Sylvia Etienne for deletion (discussion here). The article makes no claim for notability except the Ta Noutri website, which no longer exists, and I've not been able to find any reliable, independent sources. It also appears that the Czech version of the page has been nominated for deletion. Dricherby (talk) 18:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but I am not that much active wikipedist... not mentioning that I do not know the people. I can only wish you it goes well and may the bests got their job... --Niusereset (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)