User talk:Nnadigoodluck/archives/3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Move Diego Suarez

Hey, may you move Diego Suarez (disambiguation) to Diego Suarez as per move discussion here: [1]. You moved the other 2 pages. Thanks for your good work! @Nnadigoodluck:.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 14:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem

Hi. I was just about to post here, to tell you that I've undone your move at Grim Sleeper. Hopefully you can figure out why. I just saw your latest move, which I hope doesn't need further comment beyond that below. Thanks for being more careful.

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zzuuzz, I'm glad that you stopped by. Will try to me more careful next time. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 17:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to change my username

Hi My friend I apologize for bothering you. I wanted to change my username. How should I do this? جوانمرد قصاب (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

جوانمرد قصاب, Oh, you're not really bothering me and I'm glad that you came around for assistance.

For guide on changing your username, follow here. Best, —Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 12:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Sandbox

if sandbox is for only test then where do I write ? Sethabi ba sethabi (talk) 03:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sethabi ba sethabi, Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. As regards to your question, do you mean you want to create an article? —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 03:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Sethabi ba sethabi (talk) 03:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sethabi ba sethabi, Please read Help:Your first article and WP:MOS on how to write an article according to Wikipedia standard. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 03:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. Sethabi ba sethabi (talk) 04:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Funny coincidence

I was closing the move for Shincheonji Church of Jesus at exactly the same time as you! I got an edit conflict when I tried to post my close on the talk page before actually moving the article, and I saw that you did it just a few minutes before me to with the same result. Sorry, I just found that an amusing coincidence! — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MarkH21, Hahaha. What a coincidence. Really amusing. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

South African

When you turned South African from a redirect into a DAB page, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS. The move broke 1,576 links, which will have to be fixed manually.

The debate was poorly attended, but I agree with the result. Compare e.g. Indian and Romanian. Narky Blert (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narky Blert, Thanks for stopping by. Looks like Russbot is fixing it now. Will also try to fix some that are left out. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 02:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only 601 left to do, and they will all need individual attention. I think Russbot only looks at hatnotes. The remainder would take me 15-20 hours; specialists might need only half that time. All help is welcome. Narky Blert (talk) 00:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Narky Blert, okay, will see what I can do, then. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 05:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your message on my talk page

I just wanted to let you know that I was trying to put in the co-pilots name for Air France Flight 8969 but I probably spelled the name wrong The person who should not be named (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The person who should not be named, not really a problem, you can still go ahead and fix it. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 22:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nnadigoodluck: I don’t know how to change the title of a article or redirect. I’m gonna have to see WP:HELP DESK Signed by The person who should not be named (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yabagi Sani

Hey man, trying checking this article Yabagi Sani and Usman Baba Pategi if its look OK now. Much regards (F5pillar 16:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

F5pillar, I'm now helping you to fix the underlying issues. I'll enjoin you to go through my fixes and use it to improve your future articles. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 17:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man. I hope this month you should be conferred as Administrator. Much respect (F5pillar 17:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suela Janina

Hi, I noticed you had removed the notability tag which I'd previously placed on the Suela Janina article, with the explanation 'clearly notable'. Can you help me better understand the notability guideline — are ambassadors notable by default, all 20,000 (or whatever) of them? Or is there something notable about this particular one? And on a separate but related point, at the same time you also removed the single source tag, although AFAICS there is only one source listed, and a primary one at that (and one very close to the article subject) — what was the reason there? TIA, DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing, it's true that the sources on the article aren't enough. But, tagging it with notability is misleading, since the subject is clearly notable according to the sources I saw online. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 07:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nnadigoodluck: Thanks, but you didn't really answer either of my questions. What makes the subject so "clearly notable", is it just that she happens to be an ambassador? Is there a WP policy to that effect? And also, why did you remove the single source tag at the same time, when by your own admission the sources are inadequate? DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing, tagging it with single source is also misleading. There are other tags you could have used on the article. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 07:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nnadigoodluck: Hold on, how is putting the single source tag on an article with only a single source 'misleading'? In what way does it mislead a reader? It merely flags up an issue with the article. And if there are 'other tags' that could have been used, then which are they, and how are they better than the single source one which at least is factually correct? And if there are other possible tags that you think would have been more appropriate, why did you not use them yourself, instead of merely removing the one I had placed? And when you removed it, you didn't even offer any explanation as to why you removed it. FYI, I'm reverting your edit, because removing either tag without in any way addressing the issues is not acceptable. If you wish to argue your case, you're welcome to do so on the article's talk page. Regards, DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing, it's okay, you're free to revert the edit. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]