|The Resilient Barnstar|
|For your great work and contribution at Crypto++. 21:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)|
The Resilient Barnstar
The Resilient Barnstar may be given to any editor who learns and improves from criticisms, never lets mistakes or blunders impede their growth as Wikipedians, or has the ability to recover/finish with a smile.Introduced on April 26, 2005 by Sango123.
|The Barnstar of Diligence|
|For the Crypto++ article, which I found tonight. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 08:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)|
Turning off visual editor
Hey Jeffrey, I saw you are quite frustrated (as was I) with the visual editor. You can "disable" it by going to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and under "editing" the very top check box will be "Remove the VisualEditor from the user interface", so you can click that to turn it off. Take care man, — 01:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I deleted the mention you made at Category talk:Proposed deletion. PRODs show up automatically in the category depending on what day the PROD template was added. You can see yours here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ye gods. I just got a look at the page. Citespam, anyone? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. This is from the IETF, which approved the standard: Comments on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning. This is from OWASP, which is an organization dedicated to software security: Certificate and Public Key Pinning | HTTP Pinning
- the former is an email to the IETF, and the latter appears to be a) an unofficial "wiki", and b) cites... Wikipedia as the source of information. furthermore, while the first source does complain about the first "reason", it does not appear to state anything about the second, i.e. "The reporting of the broken pinset is called out as MUST NOT report". I was unable to find any "MUST NOT" sections in the RFC related to the reporting, so I am removing that part from the article. feel free to reinstate it if you have some references. ⁓ Hello71 15:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Computer Security user status
This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.