User talk:OhanaUnited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Crystal Clear action info.png

Welcome to OhanaUnited's talk page.
Please read the following before making a comment in my talk page.

  • If you leave a message here, I will reply in your talk page.
  • I do not watchlist your talk page, unless you explictly indicate it clearly in your message. I also don't cross-post your message because I feel this is redunant.
  • Comments which are rude, uncivil, or constituting a personal attack will be ignored and/or removed without advance notice.
  • If you come here to complain or rant about why I delisted an Good Article (GA) that you like/created/contributed, head over to this page. I have the same feeling as one of my favourite Wikipedia editor/administrator, LaraLove, towards how we got attacked by editors who object our delisting action.
  • Because I find it difficult to follow a conversation with anonymous, IP users, in addition to the possibility of dynamic IP address, I may not always respond to these editors' comments. While not necessary, it may help if you create an account.
  • Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Archive 1 (December 18, 2006 - May 31, 2007)
Archive 2 (June 1, 2007 - July 3, 2007)
Archive 3 (July 4, 2007 - August 21, 2007)
Archive 4 (August 22, 2007 - October 19, 2007)
Archive 5 (October 20, 2007 - November 17, 2007)
Archive 6 (November 18, 2007 - December 31, 2007)
Archive 7 (January 1, 2008 - February 18, 2008)
Archive 8 (February 19, 2008 - March 31, 2008)
Archive 9 (April 1, 2008 - April 30, 2008)
Archive 10 (May 1, 2008 - May 23, 2008)
Archive 11 (May 24, 2008 - June 30, 2008)
Archive 12 (July 1, 2008 - September 18, 2008)
Archive 13 (September 19, 2008 - December 31, 2008)
Archive 14 (January 1, 2009 - April 30, 2009)
Archive 15 (May 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009)
Archive 16 (July 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009)
Archive 17 (January 1, 2010 - June 30, 2010)
Archive 18 (July 1, 2010 - December 31, 2010)
Archive 19 (January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2011)
Archive 20 (July 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011)
Archive 21 (January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2012)
Archive 22 (January 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013)
Archive 23 (January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2015)

Enable a Geonotice or two?[edit]

Hi, I already nudged Andrew G. as requested, but our SF Wikipedia Day event has gone unnoticed for a week or so, and the date is rapidly approaching. Could you take a look? It looks like there's a new entry there today for Boston as well, though that one lacks coordinates thus far. Wikipedia:Geonotice#San_Francisco_Bay_Area_Wikipedia_15 Thank you, and happy new year! -Pete (talk) 22:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Bristol Portal nomination[edit]

The Portal of Bristol has been recieved 3 "Support" comments and not a single "Oppose" comment and also the discussion was started long back on September 10, 2015 (4 months ago). At this point, does the discussion needs to be closed? Thanks. SuperHero โ— ๐Ÿ‘Š โ— โ˜… 07:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Saudi Arabia portal nomination[edit]

The portal of Saudi Arabia has 2 "support" vote and no single "oppose" or any discussion vote yet made on it. It was nominated on December 2015 and as per present (i.e: February 2016) time, no "active" votes are even presented. Mostly, it needs to preserved as "archive". SuperHero โ— ๐Ÿ‘Š โ— โ˜… 08:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


Hello. I have just made a portal on Wetlands. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know what else it needs to be considered complete? Thanks for your assistance. H.dryad (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I've made the changes you suggest. Would you mind taking another look to see if everything is Halal? Thanks. H.dryad (talk) 13:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation page[edit]

Hello, OhanaUnited. When you changed Tuck rule from a redirect into a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.
Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Tuck rule" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks.

Tuck rule (ice hockey) has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

DYK for Tuck rule (ice hockey)[edit]

โ€” Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your undo of my University of Toronto article.[edit]


I saw you have undone my enrolment count update to University of Toronto article. The article clearly mentions that it is intended for the main (downtown) campus whereas the enrolment count shows the combined total of other two satellite campuses combined -- each campus has its own article. This should be clear if you actually read the reference cited.

Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI discussion[edit]

There is a topic in which you were involved being discussed at WP:ANI. The topic is concern over Adam9007's removal of speedy deletion templates. You are welcome to join the discussion here. Toddst1 (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Philipandrew2 and User:RioHondo edit warring at Philippines[edit]

Hi OhanaUnited, can you please do an investigation with regards to the case of sockpuppeting of this user? And also, I've noticed that some edits made in the article Philippines was been messing up big time because of those 2 users Philipandrew2 (who recently reported by RioHondo for sockpuppeting), and of course RioHondo. I think this considers as a edit warring. But of course, I don't want to judge the book by its cover first, so I'm requesting you please review their edits carefully? The edits of RioHondo are much more specific and easy to understand, but with regards to Philipandrew2 edits, I'm a little bit confused, and also I noticed that he/she is having a grammar problem so I want to see that stop. Please do address this problem. Thank you. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 04:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Very well then, thank you for acknowledging my concerns. Let make this Wikipedia, a peaceful one. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 04:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, OhanaUnited. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)