User talk:Onlynone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Onlynone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Eyrian 19:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


Re: the message you left about my edit to the Bronx River article: If you Google "Aquahung" you will see many references to the Aquahung river name. It is NOT a Latin word, it just looks like one. Ahkond 19:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal[edit]

Please see Talk:United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 2008#Merger proposal.—Markles 00:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


Thank you to have corrected my inversion between both meanings of SFTP. My apologies. --Oliver.hessling (talk) 22:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Help with revision war on DevOps[edit]

{{help me}} I discussed a change I thought should be made to the DevOps page on the article's talk page. I then made the edit. An anonymous user reverted my edit with no discussion on their part. I added a note to my original section on the talk page that since the revert had been made by an anonymous user with no discussion on the talk page, and revert left the page in a state that didn't address my original concerns, I was going to restore my edits (which I did by reverting the revert). I also left a note on the anon's talk page inviting him/her to discuss the issue on the article's talk page. A few days later I was reverted by the same anonymous user, with no explanation again. I don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm requesting the help of a third party.

Here's my original edit:
The first revert:
My subsequent re-revert:
And the most recent re-re-revert:

The section I added to the talk page, which includes my original justification for the change and my subsequent notes: Talk:DevOps#Criticism_not_Supported_by_Reference
The anon's talk page: User_talk:

Onlynone (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I've removed the section. It's not supported by WP:RS - those pages are no more than blogs - just opinions. We don't use opinions, just data. Also warned the IP. Hopefully that we be the end of it. Drop me a note if he persists, I can always semi protect if necessary.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Puerto Rico[edit]

No your work was not vandalism, and I followed the Wikipedia edit undo instructions to make this clear. Those instructions state: "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary. Do not use the default message only." Since your work was not vandalism I explained the reason in the edit summary. I stated, "No. Not exact duplicates. These are 2 different resolutions 2 years apart. But I do agree maybe the prose should be improved to make that clear.)" I do agree the two paragraphs were indeed identical if they stood as you indicated in your message to me. Hopefully after the re-write that subsequently took place, we can now also agree the prose/contents is more appropriate than the way it stood before. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 00:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)