User talk:Oo7565

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Articles for Creation Appeal[edit]

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
AFC-Logo.png

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 636 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

AFC Backlog[edit]

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
AFC-Logo.png

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 636 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

AFC Backlog Drive[edit]

Request on 07:30:09, 7 April 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Albert Escamilla[edit]


Dear Editor,

I have closed an agreement some months ago with another editor of Wikipedia, to unblock my account if I wrote an article of Zeta Espacial company without any type of advertising information and as a AFC Draft to be reviewed until was published. You have reviewed my article but also you have blocked my account also. Why do you have blocked it? It is only an AFC Draft to be reviewed, I don't understand why is need to be blocked. Could you please unblocked me to review my article Draft and try to make it better with your instructions?

Thank you.

Albert Escamilla (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

15:14:17, 8 April 2015 review of submission by GeT RiGhT[edit]


GeT RiGhT (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Could you please re-review the draft Draft:Exodus (Exo album)? It has gone through significant changes and by now I believe is qualifies as an article, but it has been over 7 days and no one has yet responded to the re-submission. Only by accepting its "articlehood" can we add more information about it such as album covers and add the links to the disambiguating page, because apparently according to Bkonrad, "no we do not link from article space to drafts".

Adopt[edit]

I am not a new user still can I ask be adoption?
If yes, then will you adopt me?
aGastya  ✉ let's have a constructive talk about it (: 07:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

00:46:02, 10 April 2015 review of submission by Ambershellyoung[edit]


Hello, I would like to know how to improve my entry. Would you please help in to make improvements that could qualify it as reliable? What are the references that were seen as unreliable, and what types of references are generally acceptable? I appreciate you review and opinion and am striving to create an entry that meets the standards of the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your time. Amber Ambershellyoung (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Ambershellyoung (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

02:52:49, 13 April 2015 review of submission by N d s f[edit]


Oo7565: I think that the article as written is pretty good. Your 'review', on the other hand, is completely incomprehensible. If you are going to reject an article that took some time to write because you feel that in your opinion it is not good enough for you, please create some actual English language sentences to indicate what your problems with it are, and how it might be improved. As far as references (you say something incomprehensible about them): do you know a good way to turn the pubmed references into correct formatting? I tried using the citation tool, following the instructions as best as I could, but got a 400 error on the page. What would be helpful would be if you could reformat them or at least indicate how to. N d s f (talk) 02:52, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Oo7565, I agree with N d s f. Your comment was nearly unreadable due to numerous spelling errors, and it seems to imply that you are being careless with your reviews. Please proofread your edits before saving. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Fixed it sorry,Oo7565 (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Ashish Kashyap[edit]

I need to notify you that I have taken this article to WP:AFD, and to invite you to comment, should you wish, on the discussion. You may remember accepting this article at WP:AFC. I have not checked whether it has varied greatly form the state you accepted it. I am not calling your review into question. I simply view the article as needing either substantial attention as it stands today, or removal. Fiddle Faddle 17:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

21:15:20, 14 April 2015 review of submission by HairPig[edit]


I just wanted to see what the specific issues are with the article, or if it is just the need for more references. I am still working on citing further references and will document that as I can.

I was less clear about not meeting criteria for notability, as this is an article about a well-known fictional character (Breckinridge Elkins) by a prominent and popular author (Robert E. Howard), and the character is referenced in at least seven other current Wikipedia articles, including two that had "red links" to the as-yet nonexistent article about the character. Four of those articles had fewer references than the rejected article, and three of those are actually brief articles about books starring Breckinridge Elkins. It was odd to me that those three books would meet criteria for notability, but the main character did not.

While I have made minor edits in the past, this is my first attempt at the creation of a new Wikipedia article, so I am happy to have any constructive feedback you may have to offer to improve it.

HairPig (talk) 21:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interswitch[edit]

Just a polite note to say that I have nominated an article you approved for deletion. It concealed its true nature well from you, I think. Or maybe I have a nose for PR pieces, who can say? Anyway you are invited to comment should you wish. Fiddle Faddle 18:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Gosh, this is a second one. I promise I'm not stalking you, I just came across it after declining the contributor's current draft. Fiddle Faddle 18:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Article Review Draft:Exilant Technologies[edit]

Can you please help me with rectifying the content in order to make it NPOV compliant and fit for submission. Thanks in advance. Devopam (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)