User talk:Osplace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Jaja Santiago[edit]

I rolled back the edits of Imleopadilla to your last version, see here, which one is correct? your's or his? Rick (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

In my last edit I just removed WP:PEACOCK words and did not notice the individual awards problems. His edits were correct, one award, one line. --Osplace 01:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Laura Daniela Lloreda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mexican and Puerto Rican
Remy McBain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Puerto Rican

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Ooops! Fixed! --Osplace 15:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.


Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Robert McClenon I do not understand why am I being warned about discretionary sanctions. Can you please remove this ASAP or explain which rules have I broken. I am not being including any disruptions, as stated in the Sammy Sosa talk. This warning may be missleading. If you found that putting this was wrong, please express that in your further edit. Thank you for your understanding. --Osplace 19:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Osplace - No. I will not remove the caution. I have not reviewed in detail who is being disruptive, but the continued argument is disruptive. Notice that the message says that it does not imply any misconduct on your own contributions. I have not researched who is involved in the tendentious editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Robert McClenon I hope you are planning to investigate anytime soon. It is completely irresponsible to behave like this. Not any better to warn us both without any investigation. --Osplace 15:51, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Osplace - The caution does not imply any wrongdoing on your part or that of the other editor. There has been disruptive editing. I do not plan to pursue the matter any further. If you think that the other party has been editing disruptively, you can report them to Arbitration Enforcement. As I said, I am finished here, unless I continue to be pinged or otherwise notified about this dispute. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Robert McClenon - What? There has been disruptive editing, but you are not willing to know anything else about this matter? You will only left the Discretionary sanctions warning there, without any further investigation? Were you mad because you were pinged? You are warned about harassment and ill-considered accusations of impropriety. You should apologize and remove that caution. --Osplace 18:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Translation notification: Community Engagement/Women in the Wikimedia movement: Conversations with communities/Organizer's guide[edit]

Hello Osplace,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish on Meta. The page Community Engagement/Women in the Wikimedia movement: Conversations with communities/Organizer's guide is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is high. The deadline for translating this page is 2018-04-13.

Hi, I recently organized a conversation series on the role of women in the Wikimedia movement. A lot of the feedback I received suggested these conversations should take place in multiple languages. This is why I recently documented the conversation series and created an Organizer's guide. If you could help me with translations, that would be great. Thank you! María Cruz.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Meta to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Meta translation coordinators‎, 20:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)