User talk:Overthrow-dictator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Siege of Srebrenica into Draft:Operation Krivaja '95. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Operation Eagle Eye (1999)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Operation Eagle Eye (1999) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/eagle_eye.htm?adlt=strict&toWww=1&redig=0DFE6F1055774E6B9131FF83569B55A0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- EN-Jungwon 05:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aftermath of the Kosovo War (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Kosovo War. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This consists of summaries of a series of events that each have main articles, and can be added as an Aftermath section to Kosovo War. If it is thought that the Aftermath section should be split into a separate article, this can be discussed at Talk:Kosovo War.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Overthrow-dictator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Žepa has been accepted[edit]

Siege of Žepa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Bosnian War. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Overthrow-dictator (talk) 11:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again here, with the "primidi" source. Please exercise caution and evaluate the sources you are adding. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 30 August 1992 Sarajevo shelling[edit]

Hello Overthrow-dictator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 30 August 1992 Sarajevo shelling for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 19:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial of Stanislav Galić has been accepted[edit]

Trial of Stanislav Galić, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

minor edits[edit]

Hi, I noticed that this edit does not actually match the requirements laid out at Help:Minor edit. Likewise, one of the sentences in there was apparent nonsense. Please update your practice about minor edits and apply more rigor to what you add to articles. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death of Akhtar Mansour has been accepted[edit]

Death of Akhtar Mansour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 Skopje protests has been accepted[edit]

2001 Skopje protests, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. Thank you for your work on 2001 Skopje protests. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am very grateful for this. I never thought anyone would have ever replied saying they like my article. Thank you User:SunDawn, and have a great rest of your day! Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian War of Independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N1. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Zavrtaljka (1994) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Battle of Zavrtaljka (1994), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short form references, Croatian Defence Council and Bosnian War[edit]

Hi Overthrow-dictator. When copying short form refs, {{sfn}} for instance, you need to copy the required cite as well. You can see what is required in my edits to Croatian Defence Council and Bosnian War. If you only add the short form ref but not the required cite, it causes a "no target error". These are off by default, but can be turned on by following the instructions here Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you have any questions please just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Operation Eagle Eye (1999) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Operation Eagle Eye (1999). Thanks! Danidamiobi (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Yugoslav Wars. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Joy,
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Overthrow-dictator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On 21 November, I only added (not reverted) "Croat–Bosniak War" to the Yugoslav Wars infobox only for it to be undone by @No such user the next day on 22 November. After he removed the commanders, I undid his work, which only counts as only 1 revision. On 25 November, he removed the entire belligerents and commanders. I then reverted his edit on 26 November only for it to be undone by @Ktrimi991.That was only 2 reverts in the span of 4 days, and for you to block me due to edit warring, I would have to do 3 reverts within a 24 hour-period. From the Wikipedia:Edit warring page states: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period." Overthrow-dictator (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are mistaken. From WP:EW: <quote>The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.</quote> Yamla (talk) 20:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I explained myself in the first edit summary; after you reverted with the summary "WHY?" I gave an extended rationale on the talk page accompanied by a ping, waited for some two days before editing further, only to be reverted by you without even a token reason given. That kind of behavior is discourteous toward fellow editors. You are not entitled to three reverts, particularly as you have not given any rationale for your preferred version of the article. No such user (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I blocked based on generic Wikipedia:Blocking policy / Wikipedia:Edit warring, but there's also a more specific set of rules in this topic area that we need to make sure everyone is made aware of. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Krivaja '95 (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 12:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Eagle Eye (1999) has been accepted[edit]

Operation Eagle Eye (1999), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 18:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surrender of the 21st Kordun Corps (1995) has been accepted[edit]

Surrender of the 21st Kordun Corps (1995), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 18:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial of Milan Babić (January 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Milan Babić instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Trial and death is already covered there but you are welcome to expand the content.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Don't think it meets WP:EVENTCRITERIA.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russian Volunteer Guard (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Srjan Knezevic (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 21st Kordun Corps (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Structure is well-sourced, but otherwise various claims remain unsourced and it's unclear what significant coverage it has specifically received.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aftermath of the Kosovo War[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aftermath of the Kosovo War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the wording of 3RR[edit]

Hi. Can you offer your thoughts regarding the question I asked here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aftermath of the Kosovo War[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aftermath of the Kosovo War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Zavrtaljka (1994)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Zavrtaljka (1994), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It does not satisfy general notability, and was declined by a reviewer.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambush near Kosovska Mitrovica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

asilvering (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Operation Krivaja '95[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Operation Krivaja '95, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Trial of Milan Babić[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trial of Milan Babić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Srjan Knezevic[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srjan Knezevic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:21st Kordun Corps[edit]

Information icon Hello, Overthrow-dictator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:21st Kordun Corps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trial of Milan Babić[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Trial of Milan Babić".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trial of Milan Babić[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trial of Milan Babić".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russian Volunteer Guard[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russian Volunteer Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Srjan Knezevic[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Srjan Knezevic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Travnik (1993) has been accepted[edit]

Battle of Travnik (1993), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 09:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry[edit]

Hello Overthrow-dictator. I noticed that at User:UÇPMB you stated that you have two other accounts, this one and user:We stand for editing. As a general rule, Wikipedians should have only one account. You currently have 43 articles in common between the two accounts, so it's important for transparency reasons that people have a way of discovering that all these edits are being made by the same person. If you wish to keep both accounts and feel you have a valid reason under the socpuppetry policy to do so, you must place on the user page of each account a link to the other account. Failure to do this will result in the most recently created account being blocked (that's this one). — Diannaa (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually very nearly blocked all three accounts for sockpuppetry - it's a good thing that I looked at your userpages and noticed those disclosure before doing so. Why are you using three different accounts to edit the same articles? Please indicate which one you will use moving forward. Girth Summit (blether) 13:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm using this one, Overthrow-dictator, from now on. Thanks for the close call. Have a good day. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep editing the other's user page?[1] It looks like some kind of test or vanity, but it's totally needless and disallowed. You're supposed to use the userboxes described at WP:ALTACCN. BTW, there was never any reason to have made new accounts on this, or almost any other, website. They all have password retrieval functions, since the dawn of the Web. — Smuckola(talk) 06:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They are my ideas, and if I can't hold them on mine, I move them there. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 10:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.....what? — Smuckola(talk) 19:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The infoboxes. Or are you on something else. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 20:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just baffled because you're giving reasons for messing with the WP:ALTACCN policy, while also simply not complying with it by adding the userboxes and leaving the account alone. I don't know how you think this makes any sense and I don't know why you won't just comply. But it also seems like you're talking about sandboxing. So just use sandboxes, like by creating any new url under your username, such as User:Overthrow-dictator/Sandbox. Use that for any editing tests, or for drafting new content without spamming the main space, and you'll be ahead of most users. — Smuckola(talk) 00:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Avdo Palić into Siege of Žepa. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vratnica attack (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not seeing how this meets WP:NEVENTCRIT. not every incident that gains media coverage will have or should have a Wikipedia article. A rule of thumb for creating a Wikipedia article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance, and the scope of reporting (national or global reporting is preferred). I do not see evidence of enduring historical significance, wide coverage in diverse sources, or evidence that the event was later reanalysed. Coverage appears routine. I do not see this subject meeting the notability threshold.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death of Hakija Turajlić (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hakija Turajlić. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article about Hakija Turajlić is mostly about her death. If you think a content fork is necessary, please establish consensus on the talk page for Hakija Turajlić.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
voorts (talk/contributions) 16:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor[edit]

Please read wp:minor, as you are marking edits as minor that are not. Slatersteven (talk) 13:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: My friend, Slatersteven was NOT kidding. You have made literally every single edit marked as minor. Why on earth would anyone do that for any reason? That hides edits from some people, depending on their profile configuration, and is considered disruptive. That's like virtually never using any edit summaries. You absolutely must stop both! WP:MINOR For that matter, we can't just leave talk page comments ignored. Though there is no official warning template for the subject as far as I know, this is a warning because I don't want you to get blocked for it, but users absolutely can be, and have been blocked for this. — Smuckola(talk) 20:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW aside that, like I said, before, you also have really made absolutely outstanding edits like a model Wikipedian. i'm assuming you stopped spamming drafts and AfC in favor of diligently sandboxing. You really need to focus, and you really need to collaborate, because my goodness you've completely abandoned a draft here. Of course, it was silly to have started a new article for a standard section of every single biography in the world. I mean, death happens. And this is not JFK or the Challenger. Merge it in to her biography *if* it is not redundant or WP:UNDUE, or copy it to your sandbox! Don't let it get automatically deleted just because it's abandoned in draft space, if it indeed isn't redundant. — Smuckola(talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Old habit I need to grow out of (can you even call it an old habit?). Thanks for the compliment, I have more free time, so that's why. About the drafts, yeah, I use sandboxing, but it's more for experimenting. (Oblivious thing; Hakija Turajlić was a he, not a she). But please explain what "You really need to focus, and you really need to collaborate" means. The collaborate means I can work with others, right? What does the other means? But yeah, thx for this. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I have created another article from my sandbox. If you would like to review it when you have time, please do so. It is about the Ground Safety Zone, a 5 km wide demilitarized zone made after the Kumanovo agreement in June 1999. Disbanded after KFOR and NATO agreed to let Yugoslav troops to enter the GSZ, after escalating attacks from the Liberation Army of Preševo, Medveđa and Bujanovac (UÇPMB). 1 June 2001 ended the GSZ and the insurgency in the Preševo Valley. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Woops, oh dear, the reply above this one is outdated. @Chaotic Enby has reviewed my article, and allowed it. Sorry for 2 replies in one day, just something to let you know. Thanks to him for reviewing it so quickly, really great! Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, I just removed a source that was blacklisted and added two new ones (including a journal article studying the consequences of the GSZ on the insurgency in retrospect). ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 13:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just curious, what was the blacklisted source, and what can make a source be blacklisted? Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lenta.ru, although only post-2014 articles are blacklisted (due to a staff change and a shift towards state-sponsored misinformation). After looking a bit deeper, it appears that pre-2014 articles can be used without issue, so I ended up adding it back. There's a pretty good list at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources if you want to. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 13:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, will check it out, thx! Overthrow-dictator (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave an edit summary[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. An edit summary is particularly important if you remove text on a talk page and it is not obvious why you are doing so, as you did on Talk:Goraždevac murders recently, when you removed several WikiProject banners. WikiProjects decide what articles are included in their scope, so removals need to be discussed or at least explained. See WP:PROJSCOPE. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Overthrow-dictator. Thank you for your work on Surrender of the 51st Brigade. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Croatian kuna into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

In [2] and [3] you added a clearly copy&pasted paragraph starting with during the war of independence. The article already talks about this in the Modern currency section. It should not repeat this in the lead, and it should not repeat this in the History and etymology section. -- Joy (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Overthrow-dictator&oldid=1219042203"