User talk:PRehse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This page is getting a bit big. I suggest you ask this bot to do automatic archiving for you.

You saw that User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox had been moved to Mackenziequinn167/sandbox and applied a speedy tag to User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox. That was unnecessary. You could have moved it back yourself - reversal of a move is permitted providing there have been no edits to the redirect. Try it next time. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

RHaworth Cheers.PRehse (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Florian Munteanu[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because nothing on the page is incorrect when it comes to sources. Another reason is that Florian Munteanu is a known public figure, and a page about him would compliment that.

According to his manager Eduard Irimia, Florian Munteanu will star in three other Hollywood films in 2019: source in Romanian.

His page was first deleted on 21 October 2018 it had no sources, which I understood. I improved the page with many additions. Some people had concerns about his boxing career. He is not a professional boxer. Munteanu said that he had 78 amateur boxing matches. Legendfootballers (talk) · 20:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


Hi! I have fixed both dead end and orphan issues on Angela King (peace activist) now. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Kind request for a potential review of "New Page": Dimash Adilet (Draft reviewed by you)[edit]

Greetings PRehse, I hope this message finds you well.

I am writing regarding a new article, the draft for which you have positively reviewed 3 days ago. The page name is Dimash Adilet I wanted to ask you, if you would be willing to review this page in your spare time, as I have just moved it into mainspace after some reviewing. I thought since you have already seen the draft, your opinion would be extremely valuable to me. I would welcome any thoughts you have on this.

I would like to create another article next month, but I only ever go on to a new article once I am sure the previous one is up to standards. If you give a positive opinion on this one, I can calmly leave it in the hands of the community, and go on to new pages. If you don't have time for this, however, by all means, do not feel pressured to review it.

Thank you very much in advance and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Keep this community great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatgoodperson (talkcontribs) 01:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Greetings! I have just checked the page I told you about, and noticed that you made a small correction in the "categories" section. Thank you for taking your time to have a look. Did you get a chance to review it? Would you have any suggestions before I move on to other content? Thank you in advance, cheers! Thatgoodperson (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Alex Andrade[edit]

I see you crossed out your delete vote. Being a tad presumptuous, I assume you're going to vote to keep it. Or are you? Papaursa (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holiday[edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hi PRehse, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

December 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)


Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 13:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018[edit]

Hello PRehse,

Reviewer of the Year
New page reviewer of the year cup.svg

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

new page reviewing[edit]

Greetings PRehse! I have some concerns that you reviewed this page and let it live in mainspace. It is full of puffery and non-neutral and unreliable sources such as the subject's LinkedIn account and company website. I went ahead and moved it back to the sandbox (via my work account Elysia (Wiki Ed)) and left the editor some feedback. I know that reviewing new pages is a thankless task and I also know you do a lot of it, so I'm sure pages like this slip through the cracks from time to time. Enwebb (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Enwebb Just placed some initial tags I seldom review articles. Definitely not this one.PRehse (talk) 23:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Ah, okay. Did you know that when you use the page curation toolbar to tag pages that it automatically marks the page as reviewed? Your log shows that you did review that page, but it seems that was not your intent. Enwebb (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year[edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello PRehse, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Meatsgains(talk) 01:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sedbergh School[edit]

You need to do a revision to the Sedbergh School page to discuss issues with abuse in the 60's from masters and students. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsclear (talkcontribs) 00:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Directive 89/391/EEC[edit]

I wrote this from scratch, what's with this revert? Hekerui (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Directive 89/391/EEC#Attribution of Workplace Health and Safety Directive if you want to comment. Hekerui (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Please leave a comment on the talk page addressing my argument. Hekerui (talk) 14:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Please respond to my comment at Talk:Workplace Health and Safety Directive. Hekerui (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hekerui Or you can move the page properly first (not copy paste) and then make the changes. What you should not do is create a topic on the same subject with just a title change like you did. It is disruptive and not helpful. Your title I think is marginally better than the original so I don't it is a problem but others may disagree.PRehse (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Ambrogio Spinola[edit]

Someone re-changed the page of Ambrogio Spinola and re-putted a title of Marquis in the name of the article, which makes it unusually long :(

I think most sources refer to him simply as Ambrogio Spinola and the lead and infobox explains all his titles. So i don't understand why the ", 1st Marquis of the Balbasses" is being added in the name of the article. Also I don't know if the move has been done correctly.

Barjimoa (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

About Arasp Kazemian[edit]

hello dear, PRhse,

About the page Arasp Kazemian all notabilities are written in persian language and in perisan websites. What should we do to keep it on Wikipedia. He is very famous, please look at his personal website --Parsbyte (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

John Erskine, 18th Earl of Mar[edit]

I notice you deleted the edit note I left here, without any explanation. It was there for a reason, but maybe I didn't explain it very well. I've re-written it; if you aren't happy about it, can you please say why? Regards, Swanny18 (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Melanie George Smith[edit]

How do you move a page when the designation page already exists? The name "Melanie G. Smith" is incorrect. Her name is "Melanie George Smith" according to the sources. BTW, instead of just reverting pages, you could have tried to help before (also when you reverted, you did not look at the changes between the pages and so you lost updated information). Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

please help me[edit]

Hi, I'm obviously doing something wrong trying to publish this article about Ashi Tashi Dorji. Pls can you advise. Doctor 17 (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Baron Cobham[edit]

I have reverted to the last version by Charlie Awesome, removing text added by suspected sockpuppet account of banned user User:G.-M. Cupertino. Unfortunatly this has also removed some of your edits. Please do not remove red links and please do not add any more text to the article unless it is supported by inline citations (WP:PROVEIT). -- PBS (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


Please be more careful. List of Teen Wolf secondary characters was not the same as list of Teen Wolf minor characters and list of Teen Wolf characters was (and still is!) monstrous in size and desperately needed splitting. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

I cant understand the issues you are talking about. Please help me understand which words are weasel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proma Mitra10 (talkcontribs) 09:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Morelos, Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amatlán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Rakim Cleveland[edit]

Why did you delete my article? He is a credible fighter and has over 3 fights in large organizations. You probably don’t much about MMA but PFL is the third biggsest MMA promotion in the United States. Please undelete it because I spent 3 hours making his page. Did you even read the article and check out record? I’m really not happy about what you did.. Castro13 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

denise mercedes speedy Deletion[edit]

is there a exact reason you keep marking the page for speedy deletion ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aherron76 (talkcontribs) 17:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your reversion of my edits of the Kaltenbach article[edit]


you reverted my edits on Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster) and Kaltenbach (White Elster). I know that for a proper attribution a move is preferred. However, I couldn't perform the move myself because the targets of the moves already existed. I've once asked an admistrator's help in a similar case, see here, but don't think the result was more clearly than my edit summary "content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution" at Kaltenbach (White Elster). (The admistrator did delete the redir, then moved the full article to the new title which was deleted before.)

Also, after I did the I did some more stuff after the copy paste of the article: I've exchanged the talk pages of these articles as well, modified the links pointing to these articles Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster) and modified the interlanguage links in Wikimedia. You did not revert this, so now the pages were in somewhat confusion. (E.g. a double redir at Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster).)

I therefore reverted your revert again. However, If you really think that my edit summary content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution is not enough for telling everyone the proper attritbution, please tell me (I put your talk page on my watch list). I can revert all my contributions, then ask an admistrator to delete the redir, and then perform the move again.

Regards --Cyfal (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Cyfal The easiest way is to request a speedy deletion (Db-G6) specific for a move (usually with Twinkle) and when granted just move the article. Complicated copy pastes are just not done. Please revert and I will help with the move requests.PRehse (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Ok, I reverted a part and will do the other things in the next days. --Cyfal (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Dong Wenfei[edit]

There seems to be no getting rid of this article. Every time it's removed the author recreates it almost immediately. Papaursa (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Papaursa Not for lack of trying, time for a new AfD.PRehse (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

TAD Disability Services and TAD Australia[edit]

Currently there is an article TAD Disability Services (which is for one state only), and a redirect to it from the national body TAD Australia. I proposed that the national body should have the article, expanded to cover other states as well. In the process, the direction of the redirect was to be reversed. Nobody objected to the proposal, so I did it. But you reverted my work on these articles with the comment "improper copy paste losses attribution - do correct move instead". I am unclear how to proceed. If I just move one of those articles over the top of the other, the history of the target page will be lost. What is the "correct move" procedure in this case where the target already exists? --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Gronk Oz I see your point. Give me a momment to set it right.PRehse (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Gronk Oz Ok please put all your changes into TAD Disability Services. A copy paste from the last version of TAD Australia before my redirect is fine. I would do it myself but then you would loose your attribution. Once done I will ask the TAD Australia to be deleted so TAD Disability Services can be moved in it's place.PRehse (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I have updated TAD Disability Services to where it was. --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 Done I see that the move is all done now Smile.gif - thank you for your help, and I apologize for causing the confusion.--Gronk Oz (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Dancin' Thru The Dark on Wikipedai[edit]

Hi there, I noticed yesterday that the wikipedia page dedicated to the film Dancin' Thru The Dark had been redirected to the Screen One page. On it, it is hard to find the film if you do not know it. As I think this film deserves its own page, I recreated it, in the same manner as the film 'A Question of Attribution that has a link to its own page from Screen One. This made me assume that the same could be done for Dancin' Thru The Dark. However, I notice that all my work has been reverted. Are you responsible for this and if yes, can you explain why this is done? I do hope the film can have a Wikipedia page.

kind regards, jotola

Jotola (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker): Jotola, if you check the history on Dancin' Thru The Dark, you will see that was reverted by Onel5969 with the following edit summary: "doesn't meet wp:nfilm". That refers to Wikipedia's guidelines for determining whether a film is "Notable" (in Wikipedia's special meaning of the term) enough to have its own article. You can read those detailed criteria at the following link: WP:NFILM.
The article as you wrote it had four references. Two of those just related to the Trivia section which should not be there at all. One was simply a link to a BBC One page that did not even mention this movie. That just leaves one, which was an interview with the writer, Willy Russell, about the movie. That one reference is a long way short of the standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
So to establish the movie's notability, I suggest starting by collecting your sources. Find all the books that have been written about the movie. Find the full-length reviews published by major critics. Find the in-depth articles written about it in major newspapers and magazines. Find where Sixty Minutes and other reliable journalistic shows have discussed it in detail. Find the major national and international awards it has won. And so on ... see the Notability criteria linked above for the sort of things that will support the case for keeping the article. Then write the article based on what those sources say, citing them as you go. I hope this helps - good luck! --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Bravo Gronk Oz. Onel5969 TT me 01:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the criteria, work to be done then. Jotola (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Farshid Asadian for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farshid Asadian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farshid Asadian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 22:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Polyamorph. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, LIberty (sternwheeler), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Polyamorph (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, not something I intended to do. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 09:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Air India 101[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Air India 101 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Petebutt (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


Sorry about that. I meant to have the article located at Skarlet, since it directs to nowhere else. I tried to do a proper move from Skarlet (Mortal Kombat character), but it wouldn't let me, since the page already existed as a redirect. I think I need some help here. Kokoro20 (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Kokoro20 Best way is to request a deletion for the purpose of a move and then when done move the page. I have stated the process for you.PRehse (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Oh, alight. Thank you. That should hopefully take care of things. Kokoro20 (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Sahib Bir Singh[edit]

Something wrong with the reviewing tool. I just moved the page, it was in the Wikipedia: space, and didn't review it at all. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Image for Wikipedia entry “Aaron Sarlo[edit]

I was wondering if you could help me. I submitted the photo yesterday, which I have permission to use. It got flagged as a potential copyright / licensing issue. It recommended that I contact the photographer who owns the image, and ask him to email Wikipedia and tell them he allows its use, which he did. I also have an invoice from the photographer that grants me a universal license to use the image on Wikipedia and elsewhere. My issue: it looks like the image is still flagged. What can I do to clear it with Wikipedia? Thank you. Brian Keiths (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Bubble Tea.png Thank you for helping me with my first Wikipedia contribution. Dlwsnz (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello PRehse,

Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Delsort - AfD[edit]

Hi PRehse, Greetings. I had nominated 4 MMA fighter articles for AfD about 4-5 days ago, but they have yet to show up on "Alert section" of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. I have sought help - see here Delsort - AfD, and Bot operator has assisted on the matter; however, I still have yet to see the AfD articles listed on WikiProject MMA page.Just wonder, does the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts need to include "delsort" on the banner of the talk page? or certain tag is missing to cause the problem. Kindly advise and thank in advance. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Peter, good day. I just want to inform you that I have sought help and the issue has been resolved, - see HERE as the bot was fixed and started to pick up delsort again. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Please review this article[edit]

Hey when you have time could you please review this article I made? Geovana Peres vs Lani Daniels II Thanks --Bennyaha (talk) 02:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)