User talk:PS.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PS.! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Gordon McNab[edit]

I recommend you take a look at WP:PROD. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Barcelona players[edit]

Thank you for making the reflist better. The list is now running for featured list status. If you think it was a good or bad list, please consider leaving a comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of FC Barcelona players/archive2‎. Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) 10:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United F.C.[edit]

Hi there. Would you mind explaining why you have added the 'citation needed' tags to the Manchester United F.C. article. The one you added a few days was valid (about the Trebles and Doubles) was valid, and I have added a reference.

However, "the policy on sourcing is Wikipedia:Verifiability, which requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations." WP:CITE - the material to which you have added the tags is not challenged, or ever likely to be challenged; therefore, I feel the tags are unnecessary. Excessive citations can clutter an article.

If its ok with you, I'm going to remove the tags, unless I hear back from you.

Thanks, Tom (talk) 21:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, well I added references to the facts you tagged anyway. I suppose it doesn't hurt. Thanks for helping out with the article. Tom (talk) 19:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from what boils down to "other articles do it", what is the reason for this edit? Nev1 (talk) 10:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this edit? is verging on edit warring. Before you change it again, why don't we discuss it on the talk page? I don't believe it is a WP:MOS, so its really irrelevant that other articles have it in italics. Consensus seems to be for keeping the way it is, since 3 people have reverted your edit. Thanks, Tom (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pomoc w robieniu artykulow i aktualizacji zawodnikow Polskiej 1 ligi(dawnej drugiej) czyli Polish First League[edit]

Najpierw sie zapytam wstepnie czy jestes zainteresowany taka robota, ekstraklase juz w zasadzie ukonczylem (praktycznie cala sam aktualizowalem i robilem nowe artykuly), wiec chodzi o 1 lige, jesli sie zgodzisz to wytlumacze dokladnie co mialbys robic. Pozdrawiam. odp--marekchelsea (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te kryteria wlasnie dyskwalifikuja pl wiki, bo artykuly sa dobre ale jest ich bardzo malo przez te durne kryteria, nie wiem kto to wymyslil, ale dla mnie to jest sztuczne hamowanie rozwoju tej czesci polskiej wikipedii i dlatego zrezygnowalem z dalszych edycji na pl wiki. --marekchelsea (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No to proponuje zaczac alfabetycznie od początku, najpierw template skladu, nowe artykuly zawodnikow nieistniejacych i infoboxy nowe w artykulach istniejacych:) Uzywaj jak chcesz mojej strony uzytkownika(tam sa moje artykuly) jako szablony. pozdrawiam --marekchelsea (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To pomozesz cos z ta 1 liga? --marekchelsea (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ale ty ostatnio to sie chyba zagranica wiecej zajmujesz:P--marekchelsea (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old Trafford[edit]

Yes, I'm sure. This year is the 100th anniversary of United moving in. – PeeJay 13:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nani[edit]

Na zasadzie "unexplained deletion". Pewien nie byłem, ale jeżeli ktoś usuwa sekcję bez żadnego wyjaśnienia, jest to co najmniej podejrzane. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 17:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barcelona Squad template[edit]

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in Template:FC Barcelona squad. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 19:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox update[edit]

Hi, please be aware that you should use ~~~~~ (five characters) for updating the pcupdate or ntupdate parameter. Your edits like this one or this one or this one left some ~ characters in the infobox. --Jaellee (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HAVE GIVEN EXPLANATION IN THE EDIT SUMMARY[edit]

why do you ignore it????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.112.212.62 (talk) 12:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please block the above person (84.112.212.62). He is stockpuppet of bigtime Vandal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.187.182 (talk) 11:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks[edit]

Your vote mattered PS, thanks for that. My RfA passed:) Warm regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

Hello. Noticed your edit to Cameron Jerome's infobox, removing the dashes in the youthyears. In terms of personal taste, I might be inclined to leave them blank, but when the new accessible infobox was being designed we were advised not to leave blanks in fields in the first column of a row. The discussion was HERE. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johnathan (footballer)[edit]

There is a Jonathan dos Santos already, please use the full name of Brazilian player to create article. Matthew_hk tc 23:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland activity check[edit]

We are doing another activity check on members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland. I've noticed that you have not been active in the Poland-related articles in the past few months (we define it as doing 10 or more Poland-related edits per month in the last three months period), and as such I took the liberty to adjust your position in our Participants list from active to semi-active. Please note that this is just a method of keeping track of how many editors are currently active on Poland-related topics. Feel free to move yourself back if you disagree with this, and/or comment on WT:POLAND. In case you are not aware of that, our project has many active discussions on its talk page, we also list Poland-related article news (hee), Poland-related new articles for review (hee), Poland-related articles in need of cleanup (here), a listing of most popula Poland-related articles (here), a portal (here), and other tools. If the activity incrases, we would like to implement other tools, such as project A-class reviews and a newsletter. We are looking forward to seeing you around more often! Take care, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karimu Alhassan[edit]

Ciężko powiedzieć, możliwe że jego imię często jest przekręcane na popularniejsze: Karim.--Oleola (talk) 13:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

W meczu z Argentyną grał na prawej obronie.--Oleola (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martín Demichelis[edit]

Do you have reliable source for this edit at Martín Demichelis? Nothing can be found about this on the websites of FC Bayern Munich and Malaga CF. The only thing I found was this at bild.de and this is not rely reliable. --Jaellee (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spiegel cites Bild, but I think the L'Equipe message is okay (at least they don't say where their information comes from). --Jaellee (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba[edit]

Mógłbyś wejść na polską wiki i porozmawiać z tym Maciekced, bo znowu cofa moje edycje bez powodu w artykule Karimu Alhassan. I tak dobrze że oczyściłem wcześniej artykuł na angielskiej z wymysłów Zombie433 bo by tradycyjnie wszystko przepisał. Pozdrawiam i życzę Wesołych Świąt.--Oleola (talk) 15:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shield Barnstar[edit]

The Userpage Shield
For Reverting Vandalism on my User Page, Much Thanks - The Interior(Talk) 18:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Adebayor[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Emmanuel Adebayor, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thank you for your contributions. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am conducting another activity check for Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland. It seems to me that you are "semi-active". Feel free to change your status here as soon as you make 10 or more edits on Poland-related articles per month! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

  • we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
    • assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
  • once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
  • you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
  • we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
  • also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
  • did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
  • we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
  • automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
  • Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!


With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

WikiProject Persondata[edit]

Just letting you know that I've placed your name in the "Inactive participants" list over at WikiProject Persondata. Please feel free to move your name back if it was placed in the list in error, or if you return :). —Msmarmalade (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!