User talk:PankajVer
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 10:54, Friday, November 29, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
- It was a lot of fun! :D PankajVer (talk) 10:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Flat Out let's discuss it 12:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Anne Delong (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your draft article
[edit]Hello, PankajVer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Peridon asked me to have a look at your draft article about SoftAge.
I've looked at your draft. This is a very nice looking article and I can tell you have worked hard on it.
The first question I asked: Does the company meet the requirements at WP:CORP to have an article here? In other words, is the company notable (that basically means famous)? Notability requires significant coverage from independent reliable sources - there must be outside sources writing ABOUT the company. You have 24 references, which is great, but let's see if they are independent reliable sources as Wikipedia defines them, and if they amount to significant coverage. Things like D&B and NASSCOM listings don't count much toward notability. Press releases and references to the company's own websites definitely don't count, because they are not independent. Things that might count: There's a news item from the Khaleej Times (ref #2) which does appear to be significantly about the company. The Amar Ujala item (ref #9) seems to be about a local infrastructure registry, not significantly about the company. What we need is things like newspaper articles, and not with just a passing mention, but with significant coverage about the company. The sources do not have to be in English, although it helps. Major awards can help for notability, but the awards won by this company are not major; they are more like "one of the top 100" type listings; so they don't help toward notability.
Bottom line, I don't think this article would survive at Wikipedia if it was nominated for deletion. I think the consensus would be that it does not meet the requirements of WP:CORP, because it does not have enough outside sources writing significantly about it. That's a judgment about the company itself, not about your article, which is very well written. The problem is that if the sources aren't there, they aren't there; there is no way to get around that by rewriting. As Peridon pointed out, sometimes there just isn't very much written about a business-to-business enterprise like this.
But I'm just one person, and if you want to submit it as an article anyhow, I will give you suggestions for improvement. What do you want to do? --MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi MelanieN, Thanks a lot for offering to help!! PankajVer seems to have given up on this one. Since I helped him with the formulation of the article, I would take it forward. Looks like the company has been covered by quite a few newspapers and TV channels in the past few months, so there are about 20 full coverages now. The question is, how do I go about this? Should I remove the cursory references entirely? Or should I just add the new ones? Also, yes, it would really help if you can give further suggestions for improvement. Thanks again :) Ish malhotra (talk) 04:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: SoftAge Information Technology Limited (October 9)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SoftAge Information Technology Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! PankajVer,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — CutestPenguinHangout 12:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:SoftAge Information Technology Limited has a new comment
[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SoftAge Information Technology Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:SoftAge Information Technology Limited
[edit]
Hello, PankajVer. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "SoftAge Information Technology Limited".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)