This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Parsecboy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nuvola apps edu languages.png
Fragmented conversations hurt my brain.
Padlock-silver.svg
This page may occasionally be locked for IP editors.

Contents

Section headings[edit]

Your reason for reverting my edit, "(no reason to remove the definite article, and HFDF is a proper noun)", goes against the consistency of the article for "High-frequency direction finding" and the Wikipedia Manual of Style, which dictates:

"Do not use A, An, or The as the first word (Economy of the Second Empire, not The economy of the Second Empire), unless it is an inseparable part of a name (The Hague) or it is part of the title of a work (A Clockwork Orange, The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien)."

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_direction_finding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Article_titles

MeanMotherJr (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

The relevant section of the MOS (i.e., MOS:SECTIONS) states that "The provisions in § Article titles (above) generally apply to section headings as well", italics mine. There are relatively few hard and fast rules on Wikipedia, and certainly very few when it comes to formatting content.
As for the title of the article, it's wrong - the term is a proper noun, and therefore should be capitalized. See for instance here, here, and here for starters. Parsecboy (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Nebraska (BB-14)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Nebraska (BB-14) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Virginia (BB-13)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Virginia (BB-13) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Ohio (BB-12)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Ohio (BB-12) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Ohio (BB-12)[edit]

The article USS Ohio (BB-12) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Ohio (BB-12) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 08:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Ohio (BB-12)[edit]

The article USS Ohio (BB-12) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Ohio (BB-12) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Virginia (BB-13)[edit]

The article USS Virginia (BB-13) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Virginia (BB-13) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Nebraska (BB-14)[edit]

The article USS Nebraska (BB-14) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Nebraska (BB-14) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

TFAR[edit]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for putting it up for me, Gerda! Parsecboy (talk) 11:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Virginia (BB-13)[edit]

The article USS Virginia (BB-13) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Virginia (BB-13) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

April–June 2015 MilHist reviewing award[edit]

WikiChevrons.png The WikiChevrons
For completing 17 reviews during April–June 2015, on behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 11, 2015, Part Zwei[edit]

Nate, I've recently decided to cut back on specific dates at TFA except in cases where the reader is supposed to infer some meaning from the date. So, for tomorrow's TFA, I'm going with "she was laid down and launched in 1905 and completed the next year". Is that a problem? - Dank (push to talk) 12:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Oh yeah, that's perfectly fine - no need to have anything specific about the construction details unless it's an anniversary of a launch or something. Parsecboy (talk) 13:05, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Like Teil zwei, even mentioned it on my talk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Missouri (BB-11)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Missouri (BB-11) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Maine (BB-10)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Maine (BB-10) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Missouri (BB-11)[edit]

The article USS Missouri (BB-11) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Missouri (BB-11) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maine-class battleship[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maine-class battleship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Wisconsin (BB-9)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Wisconsin (BB-9) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maine-class battleship[edit]

The article Maine-class battleship you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Maine-class battleship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Missouri (BB-11)[edit]

The article USS Missouri (BB-11) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Missouri (BB-11) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations![edit]

WikiChevrons.png The WikiChevrons
The WikiChevrons are hereby bestowed upon Parsecboy for his great efforts in the June 2015 Military History monthly article-writing contest, placing first with 109 points from 18 articles. Well done! Ian Rose (talk) 06:41, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Ian! Parsecboy (talk) 11:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Wisconsin (BB-9)[edit]

The article USS Wisconsin (BB-9) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Wisconsin (BB-9) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 10:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Wisconsin (BB-9)[edit]

The article USS Wisconsin (BB-9) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Wisconsin (BB-9) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Maine (BB-10)[edit]

The article USS Maine (BB-10) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Maine (BB-10) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Maine (BB-10)[edit]

The article USS Maine (BB-10) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Maine (BB-10) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Parsecboy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/T48 Gun Motor Carriage.
Message added 23:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illinois-class battleship[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Illinois-class battleship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illinois-class battleship[edit]

The article Illinois-class battleship you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Illinois-class battleship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Malvern Hill[edit]

Hello Parsecboy,

I'm a bit late on this, but I have nominated the Battle of Malvern Hill article for FA again see here) I thought you might like to know. It has been through six or seven copyedits (but who is counting) and passed an A-Class review. A review by you and some comments would be awesome and greatly appreciated. Cheers, --ceradon (talkcontribs) 15:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to take a look at it in the next day or two. Parsecboy (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Alabama (BB-8)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Alabama (BB-8) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Majestic-class battleship[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Majestic-class battleship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wyoming-class battleship[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wyoming-class battleship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Illinois (BB-7)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Illinois (BB-7) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mars (1896)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mars (1896) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Hannibal (1896)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Hannibal (1896) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wyoming-class battleship[edit]

The article Wyoming-class battleship you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Wyoming-class battleship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Illinois (BB-7)[edit]

The article USS Illinois (BB-7) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Illinois (BB-7) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification[edit]

Hi, Parsecboy. I'm just posting to let you know that List of coastal defense ships of Germany – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for August 24. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of USS Alabama (BB-8)[edit]

The article USS Alabama (BB-8) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:USS Alabama (BB-8) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Enjoy[edit]

"The Hunt for Tirpitz." :-) Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw your post on FB ;) Parsecboy (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mars (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Mars (1896) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:HMS Mars (1896) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Quang Tri[edit]

I am quite busy as of now, so you many just fail the GA and I might work on it later. Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough - thanks for letting me know. Parsecboy (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Hannibal (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Hannibal (1896) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:HMS Hannibal (1896) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Caesar (1896)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Caesar (1896) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Caesar (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Caesar (1896) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Caesar (1896) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Illustrious (1896)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Illustrious (1896) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Illustrious (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Illustrious (1896) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Illustrious (1896) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Illustrious (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Illustrious (1896) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:HMS Illustrious (1896) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Wojtek[edit]

Since I have considerable respect for your contributions in general, I am not going to report you for edit warring even though you've possibly violated 3RR on this article. I'm also not going to give you one of those warning-template things since that can be taken as an insult by an experience editor such as yourself. However, I will point out that an administrator should know better, and I will ask you to stop the edit war. Thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Cite error[edit]

Hi PB, I wonder if you could take a look at this which has sneaked in a cite error in the footnotes. Regards. CV9933 (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about that - it's fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
For outstanding wikification of the italian cruiser, I hereby award you, the Original Barnstar, for making the Naval Community of Wikipedia proud! Luis Santos24 (Have a good day!) 21:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Caesar (1896)[edit]

The article HMS Caesar (1896) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:HMS Caesar (1896) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of U.S. Navy hull numbers[edit]

Hi, it is rather irritating that you delete the hull numbers on articles of USN ships that have names that have been used only once. The hull number is an integral part of a ship's name. And, if you go on and delete it from any smaller ship (destroyers, etc.), I think this is not useful at all, since the hull number gives everyone an explanation on what type of ship it is. Could you explain your reasoning, please. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 22:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

First of all, and most importantly, hull numbers are not part of any ship's name. Many vessels have had their numbers changed throughout their careers. Secondly, the hull numbers are only useful for a small slice of our readers - namely, experts who are already familiar with the ships in question. Thirdly, Wikipedia naming conventions specify that we do not disambiguate article titles when there are no ambiguous topics. Parsecboy (talk) 23:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

July 2015 MilHist article-writing contest[edit]

Writer's barnstar.png The Writer's Barnstar
On behalf of the project coordinators, congratulations on placing second in the July 2015 MilHist article-writing contest, with 63 points from 11 articles. Well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

To tell you an old old story...[edit]

Hello Nate
It seems our old pal User:Jonas Poole is playing silly buggers again (viz. this, and many others) Could you do me a favour and enable my account for rollback rights, so I can fix it? Thanks in advance, either way...Xyl 54 (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)