User talk:Paul_012

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

with cum laude[edit]

Thanks for updating the phrasing at Poerbatjaraka. Since you seem familiar with this phrase, do you know how to properly correct this upcoming DYK entry? Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Poerbatjaraka. HaEr48 (talk) 07:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

It appears I beat you there by a merely minute :) --Paul_012 (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Phloen Chit Road) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Phloen Chit Road, Paul 012!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Talat Noi) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Talat Noi, Paul 012!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (S.A.B. Intersection) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating S.A.B. Intersection, Paul 012!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Murder of Nualchawee Petchrung) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Murder of Nualchawee Petchrung, Paul 012!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Carlo Allegri) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Carlo Allegri, Paul 012!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the patrols, Boleyn, but personally I think it's a bit of overkill to tag one-paragraph stubs for lacking inline citations and having one source. Moving the citations to the end of the single paragraph would be trivial, but seems pretty pointless since it really makes no difference to the reader. Regarding the number of sources, I don't know what others think, but to me the stub tag already conveys the need for expansion, which in itself implies additional sources. It'd seem pretty pointless to have half a dozen references tagged to the end of a single-paragraph stub. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Also, please remember that maintenance tags should be placed after disambiguation hatnotes, thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hi Paul 012, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 03:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SounderBruce 19:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

BOTREQ[edit]

Hello! Just a quick note to say that the Thailand bot you requested at WP:BOTREQ is being tested - see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TheMagikBOT 4 for the approval process. If you have any questions just ping me, or leave a comment on the approval request page. Thanks! TheMagikCow (T) (C) 12:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Sala Daeng moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sala Daeng, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, Insertcleverphrasehere, but I must question the policy support behind such unilateral incubations. WP:DRAFTIFY only states that "Articles are incubated as a result of i) a deletion discussion, ii) an undeletion request, or iii) userfication". I'd appreciate if you submotted a formal AfD for the article instead, and have reverted the (out-of-process?) draftification for now. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:DRAFTIFY isn't a policy, and there isn't a policy specifically outlining when draftification can and cannot be performed. Personally I use draftificaton for articles that are clearly not ready for article space, either because of very bad quality issues or because it is very undersourced (the case here). AfD is not right for this article, because this topic is notible enough for an article, the current version is just unfinished in terms of sourcing. Additional reliable sources are the solution, not deletion, however, I do not speak the language and cannot search them myself. Feel free to move the article back to the article space yourself after adding additional refs, or contaCT me and I can do it for you. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 07:13, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 17 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British Government is selling off its embassy in Bangkok in what will be Thailand's priciest real estate deal ever? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Nice work at Embassy of the United Kingdom, Bangkok! These topics are underrepresented at DYK, so thank you for your work on it. Cheers, MX () 14:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bad Genius[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 19 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bad Genius, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Thai heist thriller film Bad Genius is centred on what its director calls "the most boring activity on earth"—taking exams? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bad Genius. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bad Genius), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

your edit[edit]

i understanding because you are not native speaker, and reliable sources is most important for non native speaker.--123.194.194.64 (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wat Phra Kaew[edit]

Wat Phra Kaew by Ninara TSP edit crop.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Wat Phra Kaew by Ninara TSP edit crop.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Kopoon Warrior F.C. ไม่ใช่สโมสรสมัครเล่น แต่เป็นสโมสรอาชีพ[edit]

ผมว่า คุณต้องตีความ WP:Notability ใหม่นะครับ โคปูน วอริเออร์ นี้เล่นในลีกอาชีพ T4 ของไทยนะครับ แต่คุณ Vanjagenije ก็ดันมาลบอีก ผมว่าแบบนี้ก็แทบไม่ต้องรายงานทุกลีกในประเทศไทยพอดี สื่อก็ให้ความสนใจและรายงานนะครับ เช่น https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Au5AJ7V_Ys, http://www.smmsport.com/news.php?tags=%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B9%E0%B8%99%20%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C เป็นต้น ท่านต้องถามก่อนลบ ว่าอันไหนทีมอาชีพ อันไหนทีมสมัครเล่น ลบหมดมันเกินไปครับ Aquaelfin (talk) 02:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

ผมไม่ได้พูดถึงสโมสรโคปูนน่ะครับ บทความที่โดนลบแบบ speedy deletion (A7) คือเพราะไม่ได้อธิบายอย่างเพียงพอที่จะให้ผู้อ่านเข้าใจในเบื้องต้นว่าองค์กรนั้นมีความสำคัญอย่างไร เท่าที่ดู บทความตอนนี้มีลิงก์อ้างอิงไปยังรายงานข่าว ซึ่งน่าจะเพียงพอที่จะไม่โดนลบแล้วครับ --Paul_012 (talk) 04:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)