User talk:Paul W

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Note: Earlier talk page discussions have been archived. Paul W (talk) 09:40, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Editathon and Meetup invitations[edit]

Wikipedia Science Conference[edit]

Hello Paul, You're receiving this update because you asked to be informed about the Wikipedia Science Conference taking place in London on 2nd and 3rd of September. Thanks for your interest.

The call for proposals is now public and session proposals are coming in. The two keynotes, and some other invited speakers, have graciously accepted. In mid-May we will bring together a programme, a publicity poster, and an online booking form. Then we'll begin the main publicity and will need your help getting the word out.

Please put in a session proposal if you've been thinking of doing so: the deadline is the 8th May. This is far from the only way to be involved. The conference will need session moderators, a programme review group, and other volunteers: if there is a specific role you are interested in, or if you have any other questions, please email me at

There will be a large "unconference" session in the programme and - fingers crossed - a "hackathon" event two days later on the Saturday, so even if you do not have a proposal accepted, you will have a chance to shape the conference activities.

Please pass on the word to any colleagues who might want to put in a proposal or help the conference in any way. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 12:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, this is another update on the Wikipedia Science Conference taking place in London on Wednesday 2nd and Thursday 3rd of September.

  • Booking has opened at just 29 pounds, including lunch on both days.
  • Take a look at the (pretty much final) programme if you haven’t seen it yet. With 18 plenary speakers - three from overseas - as well as the large unconference section, there’s a lot going on, and the Royal Society of Chemistry is sponsoring a wine reception in the evening.
  • We are also in the full swing of publicity. Emails have been, and are, going out to funders, scholarly societies, and university departments, but any additional promotion is appreciated. Please share a link, or tell colleagues in relevant fora. All publicity material for the conference is, of course, freely licenced for you to adapt.
  • After the conference there will be two hackathons: one Cambridge on the Friday, the other hosted by Wikimedia UK in London on the Saturday. These are being led by Daniel Mietchen and Stefan Kasberger. Follow the link for more details.

I hope you’re excited as I am about this event. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alsager Hay Hill[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Alsager Hay Hill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Further issues have been noted. Please stop by. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Help with Accenture[edit]

Hi Paul, I'm reaching out because I'm looking for assistance from other editors on the Accenture article, and have had difficulty in attracting help thus far. I just posted a message on the Talk page detailing several updates that can be made to the article. As I'm working on behalf of Accenture, I'm not making any of the edits myself. I thought you might be interested helping since you're very active on WP:Companies. Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 16:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Article Pending Draft:Ultrasonic pulse velocity test[edit]

Please review pending AfC: Draft:Ultrasonic pulse velocity test.Prymshbmg (talk) 06:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Test

Wikipedia Science Conference[edit]

Hello Paul. Thanks for your note on the conference planning page, "Circulate to contacts in science communications / STEM group at CIPR and to STEMPRA" - is this an action you are able to do? Has it been done? If not, feel free to take text from my blog posts. This one is probably more relevant. You can see from the programme that there are a variety of sessions, including on using Wikipedia ethically to promote research and on " Improving the troubled relationship between Scientists & Wikipedia". Many thanks, MartinPoulter (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

London Wiki[edit]

Thanks for the Angerstein update.

I am developing the above at [1]: if you wish to make use of it (eg for Ernest Trevor Spashett above) feel free. Jackiespeel (talk) 21:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Rosemary Stjernstedt[edit]

Perhaps we can collaborate on this article. Senaka Weeraman (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Judith Ledeboer[edit]

Can we collaborate on this? Lynwalk (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, PaulLynwalk (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Joseph Hobson[edit]

Thanks for the great improvements to the Joseph Hobson article. Can you add somewhere about that he was involved with the first underwater railroad tunnel to a foreign country. Looking for something to cover the hook in the DYK nomination. Kane (Famous First Facts) is the reference to cover it. I can add you as co-editor in the nomination if you like = O. K. ? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

I was bold and added you as co-editor, since you have done so many great improvements to the article. Check to make sure I did it correctly. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Doug. It could well be the first undersea tunnel linking two distinct countries. Arguably, the Severn Tunnel (1886) in the UK does - it connects England and Wales, but strictly the English don't tend to regard Wales as 'foreign'; the Fréjus Rail Tunnel (1871) connects France and Italy but is through the Alps not undersea, though it probably passes under some watercourses; and there may be others of a similar vintage. The DYK may just need some careful, unambiguous wording. Paul W (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Apparently the hook line needs no change. AND the rewording you did to the article did the trick. Thanks again for all those great improvements = just shows you are a much more experienced editor than myself.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Famous First Facts seems to be a good reference source. I have it in a 4 mb PDF, that I would be glad to forward. This is item 3617 quoted. Just let me know what wording you feel might be better for the DYK, if you think it should be changed. Thanks again for the great improvements. I can tell you are really intelligent and know your stuff. I have a contact at the Library of Congress and asked her if she could find a better picture of Joseph. Have not heard back from her.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Only 3 other editors that I have come across as intelligent as you = User:Dr. Blofeld and User:Nvvchar and User:Rosiestep, who I communicate with occasionally.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
@Doug Coldwell: that is so nice of you to say. Made my day.  :) Thank you.!--Rosiestep (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Got a better picture of Mr. Hobson from the Library of Congress.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Who's on First[edit]

I'm at wiki time minus 4. You must be at wiki time or plus 1 ? Talking to people around the world gets me confused on time (Who's on First?) = easy thing to do for an old man.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thanks for the great improvements to the Joseph Hobson article. Very professional. Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Hobson[edit]

Thanks for the contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The Foundery has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]