User talk:Paxcoder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

[1]

Free sofware vs. Open source[edit]

Thanks for pointing this out. Please see my comment on this. Thank you.--torusJKL (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Free software[edit]

Hi... Why the image is a pointless image man?... is related to free and open sources licences, and the relation to all who interact for make software... really I made a mistake when you add it first ... so I removed that from that place ... Thank you for sending this message ... maybe you can tell me any image related to this, after that I design, and places it in the right place...

V A R G U X Flag of Chile.svg write me a comment 05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment again... Well, I drew this picture ... perhaps, as you mention, I should add arrow and some description, with a caption below.
I will create a new version, adding what you mention and some things that are useful and which are related to FOSS.
V A R G U X Flag of Chile.svg write me a comment 02:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Gnewsense[edit]

Hi Paxcoder, i dont understand it, on 4 October you add GNU/Linux to the article [[2]] with a comment, and today the reverse, whats up ? also there is no user Paxcoder who joined Talk:GNewSense. So feel free to do so now Mion (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

no appologies needed, solved. Cheers Mion (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

About my quote on St. Ignatius[edit]

Thanks for not removing the quote Paxcoder. I understand all that stuff about importance when adding citations, but to be honest, what is more important than Ignatius' quotes about Jesus? I mean, people who go to St. Ignatius' page are almost certainly going because of their curiosity of his relation to Jesus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glorthac (talkcontribs) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

La Salette comments[edit]

You suggested removal in 2008: I second that, having added some chapter and verse on why on the discussion page, as this is a gross breach of NPOV written by a Catholic adorative. Please contact me on jelmain skynet be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.142.15 (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

I suggested a removal of the reference of it being confirmed only. As I can see, this has since been provided sources for. --Paxcoder (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

ANI thread[edit]

Hello, you have been reported on WP:ANI [3]. Regards, --DIREKTOR (TALK) 13:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)