User talk:Personpersonperson

Bill Shorten[edit]

Yes I am an ALP staffer but that does not give you the right to delete my edits without giving any good reason. My account of Shorten's announcement is entirely factual and based on media accounts. If you don't like what The Age said you are free to find a quote from some other source. Adam 02:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting numerous paragraphs from Bill Shorten? You have not given a proper explanation in your edit description and the removal of such a large amount of information that is not clearly vandalism is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Could you please give a proper explanation of your removal in terms of why Wikipedia:Policy would support your removal of so much information. Xtra 02:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Carr may be a bit abrasive, but his editing is highly neutral and valuable to Wikipedia. Please do not remove information from articles. If you believe that it is too slanted, then find some opposing material, but do not just remove slabs of an article. Xtra 02:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Xtra 02:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This has all the appearence of hypocrisy- you spend half your waking life reverting other peoples edits--at your merest whim w/o asking anyones permission--"This is considered impolite and unproductive" Ive given my reasons to you. If you are satisfied with this oily saccharine puff piece for Shorten. Then you have no objectivity. And how comes Carr gets to call me an 'idiot'(charming) without censure?Personpersonperson 03:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you accused me of unprofessional and improper behaviour (editing an article for partisan political purposes), on the basis of no evidence whatever, you are in no position to complain. Adam 04:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me thinks you complain slightly too loudly. Im sure that Shorten is a saint- at least going by your edits--just dont treat me as a simpleton. Why wont you tolerate edits that may tarnish the image of your golden boy? Personpersonperson 04:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am perfectly happy for you to add quoted material hostile to Shorten. There's plenty of it out there, it's not my fault if you can't find it. You are not free simply to delete factual material. Adam 05:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia. The aim is not to 'sanctify' nor to 'tarnish'. Edits should be both verifiable and neutral. I'll continue on Talk:Bill Shorten. Thanks, Ben Aveling 07:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. --cj | talk 05:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Angusmcmillan.jpg[edit]

The file File:Angusmcmillan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]