User talk:PeterEasthope

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Function space[edit]

Hi Peter, and welcome here. I saw your edit to Function space, where you wrote that "In Category theory a function space is a map object." However, later on the article says that a function space is an exponential object. That seems to be quite confusing. Unfortunately, I don't know category theory, so I was hoping you could reconcile those two statements. Additionally, I don't think that category theory should be mentioned in the first paragraph; perhaps it's best to move all discussion to where "exponential object" is mentioned?

Incidentally, have you already come across Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics? That's just a bunch of people who like working on maths articles. It's a good source for advice (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Editor resources or ask at the talk page). If you want to join, just add your name at the list of participants).

Take care, Jitse Niesen (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Jitse. Just made a change to address the matter.

Still I am concerned that possibly "function space" and "map object" are not synonymous. Perhaps a function space is an instance of a map object. If this is true, the map object deserves to be an article with function space mentioned as an example.

   ... PeterEasthope (talk) 16:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

John Thomas Walbran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— The Earwig (talk) 08:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Correct a spelling error[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How can a spelling error in a summary in a page history be corrected? Specifically, in the summary for my edit at 2015-10-18, "berth" should be "birth". Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Once the edit is saved you cannot edit the summary. However, you can do a dummy edit to save a new summary without actually changing anything. If you have an further questions please feel free to place a new {{help me}} request. --Stabila711 (talk) 04:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bochs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, the error was unintentional. A robot or human has fixed it. Thanks, PeterEasthope (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Olives Hospital (July 15)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse logo
Hello! PeterEasthope, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)