User talk:Phynicen/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Tomb Raider (series)

Thanks for the fact correction on the tomb raider article. --TudorTulok (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem :) Neutralle 11:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguating swimming

Hi Neutralle, I see you are disambiguating the term "swimming". I would suggest using the article Swimming (sport) rather thanHuman swimming when disambiguating articles on athletes such as Olympic swimmers. Cheers,Mattinbgn\talk 11:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, good idea. Thanks for the note. Neutralle 11:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Kingston upon Hull

Hi, I think that the peer review comments have all been sorted out on this so have nominated it for a good article.Keith D (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the note! Neutralle 18:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

The Mutual Fund Store

Hi Neutralle. You have nominated my article on The Mutual Fund Store for deletion. I wanted to see what type of information you are looking for so I can correct it. I have linked Adam Bold to this article. I believe this article is objective and notable for Wikipedia. Several secondary references have been included in the article. It is written with factual information. I followed formatting used in other articles on Wiki such as Edward Jones Investments and A.G. Edwards. Please let me know what other type of information you are looking for so I can edit the article appropriately. Thank you.Sunshine1021 (talk) 11:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello sunshine1021, thanks for contacting me. The main reason for my deletion nomination of The Mutual Fund Store was due to the article being written like an advertisement and therefore possibly not suitable for inclusion within Wikipedia. As these reasons could possibly be biased and not shared with other editors, I created a deletion discussion to hear other editor's thoughts on the article. Formatting on the article is excellent and not in question. Neutralle 13:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks! Nice deleting that sockpuppet. He really ruined my page.

Aprill809

23:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


Egyptian revival decorative arts

It was a significant artistic movement. Take a look at Egyptian revival architecture. I'll get a page up. It won't be perfect, but people will come along and add to it. There are a lot of buffs annd collectors, not to mention academics who write on this style.Egyptomania (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I requested speedy deletion because there was one sentence on the article at that time. That's not enough to justify an article. It doesn't matter now though as the page has been vastly edited since then, and speedy declined :) Happy editing. Neutralle 09:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified School District

Hello Neutralle, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lassonde v. Pleasanton Unified School District, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to court cases (and this one claims importance anyway). You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SoWhy 15:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

  • No problem. Thanks for the heads up! Neutralle 19:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

For my userpage vandalism revert. I'm always surprised I don't get hit more on there. GedUK  19:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

  • No problem ;) Neutralle 20:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Ta

I must have really rattled someone's cage... The Chatsworth Products message looked OK, but I can't remember tagging it! Who the anonymous one was, I've no idea. Doesn't upset me. I might be part Jewish anyway - ancestry on one side rather uncertain. (Well, the ancestors are there but where their ancestors came from is another matter...) I do work with spam and AfDs quite a bit, so perm any 1 from 100. Peridon (talk) 19:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I now do know where the cage was rattled - Tony Di Carlo now deleted. Once again, thanks for tidying me up.Peridon (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem :) I've had it myself before too. Neutralle 20:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)