User talk:Pinkfloyd11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Pinkfloyd11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Brother Bulldog (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Pinkfloyd11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amba (Mahabharata), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kunti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vijaya (bow), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Verifiability[edit]

I noticed your recent edits are not in good taste. Vandalized contents , edits without supporting proper references , MOST IMPORTANTLY ANALYSIS SECTION OF SOME ARTICLES are removed and cleaned up. It seems you are simply deleteing or reverting the vandalized contents back into wikipedia. I noticed you asking " should i provide reference to every line?"

The answer is see WP:V. I am quoting some general points from WP:V for your ease of understanding.

All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution

Attribute all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged to a reliable, published source using an inline citation.

Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source.

It seems you are involved in Reference bombing by simply giving a inline citation to some published source most time which may not have any connection to your edited contents.

See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources

It says,

Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in the Wikipedia article.

Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both. These qualifications should be demonstrable to other people.

Most importantly the claims you added in Analysis section of many articles are simply not acceptable bcoz

Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact

About Self-published sources (online and paper) - Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunkrishna90 (talkcontribs) 04:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


Please go through these links before making further edits

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources

Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 04:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)