User talk:Piotrus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
There is no Cabal

Qxz-ad39.png Qxz-ad20.gif

WikipediaSignpostIcon.svg You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.


"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017) add new archive

Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship[edit]

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
ONUnicorn 101 5 0 95 14:37, 30 May 2017 5 days, 17 hours no report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 20:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Who's lurking?[edit]

Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days

Detailed traffic statistics


Proposed deletion of Oney, France[edit]

Please do reference guidelines upon deletion yourself, especially of articles on (probably) the world's number one source of information. Whatever the guidelines, you just suffocated a tiny piece of solid information contribution to the world without any legit reason, or even Googling. Have a good life and please help contributors and don't silence them. If you want to decrease the amount of misinformed people then do something about mainstream media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Androst (talkcontribs) 23:56, December 29, 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.2[edit]

Newsletter Nr 2 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Stamboom png.svg

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Progress report:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogyconnect

(In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial)

At m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we should propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project?

Read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

Future:

The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.

You can

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Genealogy project need your vote for creation of an email list[edit]

Newsletter Nr 3 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Stamboom png.svg

Participation:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Request:

In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective.

At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote.

In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list.

Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.

Future:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.4: Mail list created![edit]

Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Stamboom png.svg

Participation:

This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

Mail list is created:

The project email list is now created and ready to use!

Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy

Future:

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Where to request closure of Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive[edit]

The discussion (Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive) was listed at but then delisted from template:Centralized discussion. Before the listing, the discussion attracted participants. The listing might have attracted others more. How complex is the issue you raised? I want to request closure at either WP:ANRFC or WP:AN. --George Ho (talk) 04:56, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

– Thanks for the response. Yes, either an admin or an experienced uninvolved closer. I see that the "Question:Deletion" subsection is tagged with RFC. That can be still open, while the remainder above the subsection can be closed. If you can need just one closer, you can go to WP:ANRFC. If more than one closer, best to request it at WP:AN. Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 15:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
– Okay. So... how many closers do you need? Therefore, I'll go to the right forum. --George Ho (talk) 04:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Just wondering before I go to the right forum. How complex or simple is the issue that you raised there? George Ho (talk) 05:40, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
– No worries. I was precautious, so I started the subsection about closing it properly before requesting closure. Therefore, someone else can suggest either one or more closers. --George Ho (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I requested a closure at WP:ANRFC. --George Ho (talk) 22:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

– Someone else suggested two-person closure, so I requested it at WP:AN#Re-requesting closure on RfC discussion about WP:NSPORTS. --George Ho (talk) 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holoverse[edit]

Hi, I have removed the prod tag you placed on Holoverse, as it was undeleted on May 8 ([1]) and per policy is ineligible for prod. I did this on procedural grounds only, and would not object to nominating this article at AfD. Thanks, —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weyoun[edit]

Why, exactly, do you continue nominating notable things for deletion? I've taught you to fish, and yet you don't appear to do even the most basic searches expected by WP:BEFORE. I've offered to pre-review fictional topics for you; you never do. What motivates you to behave in such an impolite manner? How can I motivate you to work collaboratively and follow best practices? Whatever that takes, it is almost certainly less work and less damaging to the encyclopedia than trying to clean up after your various inappropriate fictional element nominations... Jclemens (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Tagging articles for deletion[edit]

Hello, I've come across some articles you've nominated for deletion via proposed deletion. I just wanted to give you a heads up that the common best practice is to place deletion tags (speedy, prod, or AfD) at the very top of the article, before any maintenance tags. I have moved the tags you placed on Jedipedia.net and HashiCorp, as they were below the maintenance/problem tags. This is not a terribly big deal, since you still put the deletion tags at the top of the articles before the article text, but as I said before it's a common best practice.

Also it's not a good idea to embed an AfD tag within a {{multiple issues}} template, as the AfD tag gets obscured. I've moved the AfD tag you placed on Holoverse out of the {{multiple issues}} group and to the top of the article. Again, not really against policy as far as I know, just not good practice.

Since you're involved in nominating articles for deletion and adding maintenance tags to articles, and you've been around a while, I'd suggest enabling Twinkle on your account. It's completely optional, but it makes nominating articles for deletion and adding maintenance tags a lot easier. Thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

SpiraTeam[edit]

Hello, I see your comments on the page I created. "I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Nicacedric (WP:SPA, creator) with the following rationale "Thank you for your feedback or concern regarding notability. I respectfully but strongly disagree - please look at the 8th reference to see one of the strongest links proving that the information is verifiable and written by a third-party leader". I am not impressed by reference 8, a website with a title like http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com seems almost to be saying 'we review whatever you pay us for'. TechTarget "sells marketing programs and data analytics services for targeted sales and marketing efforts". Marketing, aka spam, is what this entry is. Per WP:CORPSPAM, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)"


I am a bit frustrated because, within the software industry, Tech Talks is actually a very reputable. Just to be clear, TechTarget writes articles only on the more important products and I know the company did not pay anything to them for any reviews or write ups. What is notable for other products (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranorex) that is not for SpiraTeam. All smaller companies all have lots of third party articles, studies, etc. so I am not clear what the standard is exactly. People in the industry know of SpiraTeam and Ranorex. Gartner has included Inflectra SpiraTeam in its Magic Quadrant each year (only the top tools in the industry get listed): https://www.gartner.com/doc/2625917/magic-quadrant-application-development-life https://www.gartner.com/doc/2037115/magic-quadrant-application-life-cycle https://www.gartner.com/doc/2980720/magic-quadrant-application-development-life

I look forward to hearing from you and thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicacedric (talkcontribs) 18:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Cracow złoty[edit]

Piotrus,

At your request, I opened an RM. Also, I'm not Matthead, please refrain from making accusations like that.

Thanks,

Genealogizer (talk) 04:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

That doesn't look like Matthead. I doubt it's a new user or even someone who hasn't been involved in discussion regarding naming and diacritics previously, but not Matthead.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

I've been on Wikipedia for 15 months, so I'm not exactly new, but if you're insinuating that I'm the reincarnation of another Wikipedia user, you're wrong. Genealogizer (talk) 06:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK review on Cenker[edit]

Thank you for the positive review. I request that e Columbia link not be added however. In fact adding any other links (like to RCA) would be a mistake. The reason is that if someone follows the Columbia link (or any other) from the hook to another article they will not see anything about the info I used in the hook. The Columbia article for example is a general article about that Space Shuttle. There is not even anything about Bob Cenker there, never mind anything about the narrowly averted explosion. If they are interested in details on Columbia, once they are reading the Cenker article, there are plenty of links not only to Columbia but other related items in the Cenker article, including the article for that specific shuttle mission, the Space Shuttle Program, NASA, RCA, etc. Thanks again! RobP (talk) 11:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Political history of the Ottoman Empire has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Political history of the Ottoman Empire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Old Axolotl[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of The Old Axolotl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)