User talk:Pokelova

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Pokelova, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account with Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!   — C M B J   06:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Userpage[edit]

Do you think you can fix the "About Me" section of my userpage? It looks retarded. --Pokélova (Pokémon Lover) (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure! How does that look?   — C M B J   07:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! ^-^ --Pokélova (Pokémon Lover) (talk) 07:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome. If you need anything else, just let me know.   — C M B J   07:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I will...... You seem like a very helpful person. --Pokélova (Pokémon Lover) (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


S'Up[edit]

I'm not happy what you said to me. :(. I'm So SAD! I Can kill myself. Thanks - Joshvs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshvs (talkcontribs) 19:00, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Hmm...[edit]

You are interseting! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshvs (talkcontribs) 16:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Keystone motel[edit]

Can you make keystone motel on the wikipedia? Crazybob2014 (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lion 3: Straight to Video‎[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Lion 3: Straight to Video‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Pokelova. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

May 2017[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at South Park (season 21) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AussieLegend () 17:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

  • To clarify, we do not create season articles based on scant information and a single press release. Per WP:TVUPCOMING when all we have is notification of an upcoming season a note is added to the lead of the episode list article. A section for the forthcoming season is not added until a sourced episode table can be created. We certainly do no create entirely separate season articles until there is substantial information that justifies creation of a separate article. An empty episode table does not constitute substantial information. --AussieLegend () 17:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
None of that seemed to apply to the last few seasons. But I guess what would a website be without inconsistent moderation? And you keep calling it unsourced. The press release is the source, or is the horse's mouth not good enough for you? And the episode table wasn't empty, every episode has an established air date and production code. Unless episode titles are required now for whatever reason, in which case you better get your ass over to Game of Thrones (season 7).--Pokelova (talk) 17:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia is moderated by its editors. Than an incorrect practice has managed to go unchecked for a period of time does not justify continuation of the incorrect practice.
The press release is the source - What you created did not include any inline sources, only an external link. This is not the only problem with the article. There are others but these are not worth fixing, as the article should not exist until there is substantial content including, but not limited to, a properly sourced episode table. --AussieLegend () 18:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Again, the episode table was sourced. The fact that it was only included as an external link rather than redundantly using it in the reflist is something you could easily fix instead of deleting the article. I'm sorry reading an external link is too laborious for you.
I also disagree with your assertion that it doesn't comply with WP:TVUPCOMING, the only thing mentioned there that seems to be missing is a mention of when the season was renewed. Which again is not featured in previous season articles and could also be fixed if you wanted to put a little effort in.--Pokelova (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at South Park (season 21) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

  • @Pokelova:, I have included you and the comments made to you on the talk page of the actual article, Talk:South Park (season 21). Let's keep any further debate on this subject where it belongs, on the article's talk page. - SanAnMan (talk) 19:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Pokelova reported by User:AussieLegend (Result: ). Thank you. AussieLegend () 19:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Infobox television season[edit]

Please take some time to read the instructions for {{Infobox television season}}. It is no longer necessary to use |prev_season= or |next_season= if the infobox is formatted correctly in accordance with the instructions. that is why they were removed in this edit and they should not have been restored. --AussieLegend () 19:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "South Park (season 21)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 11 June 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning South Park (season 21), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Pokelova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories and biographies of living people[edit]

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted this edit. You added a category to a biography of a living person, but you didn't include any citations to reliable sources that verify it. We need to know where you found this information. In biographies, this is very important because it can affect people's lives. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Helen Brown (author)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Helen Brown (author), Pokelova!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi there, I've tried to find a reliable source to reference Helen Brown's Works section. I failed in finding one. Can you try, please? Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)