Jump to content

User talk:PositiveGridBias

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi PositiveGridBias! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I did read the introductory material before I edited my first article back in December
PositiveGridBias (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Ebrahimi (April 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
StarryGrandma (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PositiveGridBias! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StarryGrandma (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the quick review! I urge you to reconsider your rejection. You should not apply notability criteria that are intended for purely academic research (WP:NPROF) in this case. Ebrahimi's research on space propulsion has significant practical application. The references include eight independent sources covering her work and the extreme amount of reads of both the original scientific paper and the summary article by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers clearly demonstrate notability, in my opinion. I therefore respectfully ask you to reconsider and apply a more reasonable notability criterion. PositiveGridBias (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Ebrahimi has been accepted

[edit]
Fatima Ebrahimi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]