User talk:Producercunningham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi, I saw your edit in the article about Ted Kenndey, adding "..., although they do retain at filibuster proof 59 seat majority out of the 99 filled seats.". I'm not exactly sure what you mean but I'm pretty sure you are wrong. For a cloture motion to pass you need three fifths of the Senators "duly chosen and sworn". After Kennedy's demise the number of Senators "duly chosen and sworn" are 99, as you say, but three fifths of 99 is 59.4 and 59, the number of Senators in the Democratic caucus, is less than 59.4. Hence I think you are wrong to assert that Democrats have a filibuster proof majority. If you agree, maybe you can change it back. Jkej (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean by "reduced super majority" and that was not the term you used in the article. In what way is this situation fundamentally different from an ordinary majority? Jkej (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Support and criticism of Cindy Sheehan[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Support and criticism of Cindy Sheehan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Support and criticism of Cindy Sheehan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Black Kite 17:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rollo Carpenter[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Rollo Carpenter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Korruski (talk) 10:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Coastal GA.PNG[edit]


Thank you for uploading File:Coastal GA.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Th MVC-020S.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Th MVC-020S.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Th MVC-020S.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Ausflag2.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)