I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible.
If you leave me a message here but do not plan to watch this page for my reply, please say so as I do not normally copy my replies to other Talk Pages.
Hello Pseudo-Richard, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to July 2006 Java earthquake has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Compare your add with the source – It's word for word (Cars, motorbikes and boats were left mangled amid fishing nets, furniture and other debris.) Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 03:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
"Maybe centuries from now, scholars will debate who was the real Richard and who was the pseudo-Richard. But probably not..." ... You sir are a self important twit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
I actually think you might be right about that. I think I'm just an angry person, and I'm not sure what compelled me to troll through wikipedia talk pages this morning in the first place - a lapse in judgement. No longer feeling very angry and questioning my own behavior, I actually came back here to remove that. I'm sorry. I think this http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/greater-internet-fuckwad-theory is real and I'm not sure what came over me. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2015 (UTC)