User talk:Purekaf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Purekaf, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 21:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Purekaf! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Help me![edit]

check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me to protect this page Shadmehr Aghili from spamming and editing without permissions

Purekaf 06:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello. If you feel a page needs protection of any sort, you should make your case at WP:RFPP. Hope that helps. Cheers! ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Shadmehr Aghili. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Reventtalk 08:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Shadmehr Aghili[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please discuss the changes you wish to make on the talk page of the article. — JamesR (talk) 05:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Shadmher Website 1.jpg[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Shadmher Website 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shadmher Website 1.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shadmher Website 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bahar e Man[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bahar e Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Thebestofall007 (talk) 13:07, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright infringements[edit]

Stop This is your only warning: if you upload copyrighted images to Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Yunshui  07:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

fuck you i have source of file you delete it on purpose

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui  08:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purekaf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

i have source of file that i upload Purekaf 08:46, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purekaf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

unblock because i dont any thing wrong the jerkoff blocked me with purpose to stop proving shadmehr aghili page i will make hundreds topics if no one unblocking me Purekaf 13:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Abusive unblock requests are not entertained. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

the jerkoff blocked me on purpose i have source of my file , they first prevent my protection request, then revert my simple editing then they cant stop me manipulate me with user blocking Purekaf 13:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

The {{help me}} template should not be used to appeal a block. Please continue to follow the unblock request instructions as you have already done, and give an Administrator time to review and answer your unblock request. Please only use the {{help me}} for help in using or editing Wikipedia. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 13:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Purekaf that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The term "jerkoff" is derogatory, uncivil, and should not be used in a conversation about another editor or administrator on Wikipedia. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 13:35, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

how can i speak to owners of Wikipedia because no one want to help me i want to create new meta function to change the revolution of business and benfit and legel abusing with complex auto bot Purekaf 14:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello. You already have your block review request going, as I can see. There is no point in trying to draw further attention to your user page by using the {{help me}} template. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 14:48, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purekaf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

stop mess around i do nothing wrong unblocking me Purekaf 14:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WHen you are asked to stop doing something, and your immediate respomse is to threaten to do it again, a block is the most likely result. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purekaf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

i wont turn back what i done because it wasnt wrong so unblocking me i like scripting in Wikipedia and if someone unblocked me i will do my things agian i have right to do it Purekaf 16:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The fact that you are blocked should tell you that you don't have any implicit "rights" to do what you want on Wikipedia. If you continue to make similar unblock requests in which you threaten to resume your disruptive behavior, you block will be extended. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purekaf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

i dont care unblocking me, i am useful person i do something 90‰ of users can not do so i dont care i get block i can create new account but i wont create because i dont need to prove anything to anyone for the 5 time unblock me Purekaf 17:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Demanding to be unblocked and veiled threats to evade the block do nothing to convince reviewing admins that you understand why you were blocked and will not continue disruption should they grant the request. As you appear to be incapable of crafting a proper appeal and continue to use this talk page to post repeated inappropriate requests I am revoking your talk page access. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Tarafdaar. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Justshadmehr.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Justshadmehr.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ShadmehrPhotoshoot.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShadmehrPhotoshoot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC)