User talk:QuackGuru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This user is taking a wiki-break.

Check sources[edit]

www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette

http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/

Thornton shooting[edit]

Just a friendly reminder to use the template given at Template:Cite web or Template:Cite news to add new references instead of simply a link between brackets.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 16:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quackery?[edit]

Would you please take a look at Affective neuroscience. It smells like bullshit to me. And you like calling bullshit bullshit. Thanks. That man from Nantucket (talk) 07:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

The paragraphs under "Meta-analyses" seems to be unruly. Someone who is familiar with the research would have to improve it. That requires reading many recent reviews. In the future I will be calling a lot of things what they truly are. QuackGuru (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
I have no desire to do the research. Frankly Wikipedia doesn’t deserve what little effort I do contribute. But I don’t like people reading bullshit and believing it is true because they read it here.That man from Nantucket (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is free to copy provided the license information is included in the citation. QuackGuru (talk) 14:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Furthermore, your two colors, vermillion (also vermilion) and burntorange, are not on the list of 16 HTML colors or the list of 124 X11 colors. The replacement markup for <font> recognizes only color names on these lists. For vermillion/vermilion, I found online references giving the RGB hex code equivalent. For burntorange, I found numerous online references, but none of them are correct, so I experimented and came up with a very close approximation. So, with that preamble out of the way,

You are encouraged to change

[[User:QuackGuru|<font color="vermillion">'''QuackGuru'''</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<font color="burntorange">talk</font>]]) : QuackGuru (talk)

to

[[User:QuackGuru|<b style="color: #e34234;">QuackGuru</b>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color: #B02200;">talk</span>]]) : QuackGuru (talk)

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

A revert of my contribution to Regulation of electronic cigarettes[edit]

Special:Diff/813745321: Would you mind explaining, please? I initially though about converting it to an unordered list for accessibility, but then changed it to a table at the last second. Now there's no semantic hints, no colons.

A table could also have {{Yes}}, {{Maybe}}, {{No}} and {{Dunno}}. What do you think? 84.250.17.211 (talk) 07:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

There is no need for a table for an entire section. It is easier to read without the distracting table. I usually add a table for supplementary content. QuackGuru (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)