User talk:Quadell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This editor is a Looshpah Laureate of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix, Errata Sheet, and Author's Signature.

Just to let you know[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Ottawahitech, I don't see myself mentioned there. Quadell (talk) 16:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, Quadell. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Culturally significant listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Culturally significant. Since you had some involvement with the Culturally significant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC)