|Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
|This is Quenhitran's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Quenhitran.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31|
|Threads older than 15 days may be archived.|
- 1 Ball python edit
- 2 Today's articles for improvement
- 3 Support request with team editing experiment project
- 4 Salve!
- 5 This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)
- 6 This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)
- 7 This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)
- 8 Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- 9 Women in Red World Contest
- 10 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
- 11 This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2017)
- 12 Wikidata weekly summary #289
- 13 Tech News: 2017-49
- 14 This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2017)
- 15 Wikidata weekly summary #290
- 16 Tech News: 2017-50
Ball python edit
Regarding ball python, I appoloise for being a novice with coding and such not quite sure where I am supposed to comment these things, but I beleive the edit I made to be correct, all information is valid and some minor changes to the way things read have been changed. Eg: the note regarding the royalty and pythons is a common sentiment, buy nobody can provide a definitive source, hence me changing that part in particular. Please revise your decision to remove my edits, thanks.
Today's articles for improvement
- Hello Quenhitran:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Support request with team editing experiment project
Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.
Dear Guy, My edit was amazing and how dare you change it. By the way, check out my wiki video maker! Wiki Video Tutorials
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Quenhitran! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:59, Monday, February 13, 2017 (UTC)
|Say Hello to the World||An Invitation to Earth||Small Changes, Big Impact||The Neutral Point of View||The Veil of Verifiability||The Civility Code||Looking Good Together|
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2017)
Wikidata weekly summary #289
17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2017)
Wikidata weekly summary #290
17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)