Start a new talk topic.
|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is Quenhitran's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Quenhitran.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15|
|Threads older than 15 days may be archived.|
- 1 Maranello edit
- 2 Today's articles for improvement
- 3 Support request with team editing experiment project
- 4 Salve!
- 5 This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)
- 6 This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)
- 7 This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)
- 8 This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2016)
- 9 Wikidata weekly summary #194
- 10 Tech News: 2016-05
- 11 Invitation to the Google Doodle task force
- 12 This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2016)
- 13 Tech News: 2016-06
- 14 Wikidata weekly summary #195
- 15 The Signpost: 03 February 2016
Regarding Ferrari Maranello Series, the number I put down is the sum of 550 and 575M production added together, the numbers being available on each respective model's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 01:15, 16 September 2014
Today's articles for improvement
- Hello Quenhitran:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Support request with team editing experiment project
Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.
Dear Guy, My edit was amazing and how dare you change it. By the way, check out my wiki video maker! Wiki Video Tutorials
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2016)
Wikidata weekly summary #194
21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to the Google Doodle task force
|Hello, Quenhitran. You're invited to join the Google Doodle task force of the Today's articles for improvement project. We aim to improve articles on current and previous Google Doodles to turn them into a valuable and inspiring resource for interested readers.
If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thank you for your consideration.
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2016)
18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #195
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
- From the editors: Help wanted
- Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost
- Traffic report: Bowled
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration