User talk:RAEciel

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RAEciel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Closedmouth (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Idaho, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. RAEciel, you have received several warnings and a block for disruptive editing, but it does not seem to have made any difference to you behavior. Therefore, please consider this a final warning. Do not add any more promotional material, unsourced commentary, or unnecessary capitalization (which also comes across as promotional) to any articles, or you will face an extended block. Vanamonde (talk) 04:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]