User talk:RL0919

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Disambiguation link notification for January 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheating Cheaters (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strand Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Random plot generator[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Random plot generator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject is non-notable and silly.

Plot generator has also been proposed for deletion because of reasons listed at the top of that article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 06:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

As I say on the plot generator page - my interests have moved elsewhere - and I have said all I wish to add.

If you wish to develop the theatre pages here [1] feel free. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ambrose Applejohn's Adventure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Hawtrey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Volunteer Organist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Attribution[edit]

I undid your edit to Pascual Madoz, because the template {{EB1911}} is not redundant. {{EB1911}} takes the same parameters as {{Cite EB1911}} but they are used for different purposes:

  • {{Cite EB1911}} is a replacement for {{Cite encyclopedia}} because it fills in some of the parameters such as year=1911 for the editor and adds the article to some hidden maintenance categorises.
  • {{EB1911}} and its various redirects such as {{1911}} do all that {{Cite EB1911}} does but also adds attribution text if the contents of some of all of the article are copied from EB1911. This fulfils the requirements of the plagiarism guideline.

In this case the Earwig tool shows clearly that most of the text in the Wikipedia article was copied from wikisource:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Madoz, Pascual

-- PBS (talk) 10:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

IP user you blocked was defended by another user[edit]

RL0919, the IP user you blocked, 69.118.146.138, was previously defended by Toddst1. Toddst1 had previously defended 69.118.146.138 at the WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism when AdamDeanHall previously reported the IP user, saying it's not vandalism which the IP edits are very much are at best. Several users, including AdamDeanHall, have been reverted his/her edits and this user keeps on doing it. I mean AdamDeanHall may be at times disruptive, but the IP user 69.118.146.138 is also being disruptive, maybe more so and Toddst1 is still defending that IP user. I thought I should bring this to you. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I also saw Toddst1's comments on the IP's user talk page and on his own user talk page. Obviously I disagree with his assessment and agree with yours. The ongoing pattern of dubious edits, including in some cases what seem to be manufactured citations, while ignoring all talk page warnings and discussions, is at least disruptive, and most likely intentional vandalism. --RL0919 (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Alan Greenspan and the Iraq War[edit]

RL0919, I've reworded my submission for Greenspan advising the George W Bush administration to depose Saddam Hussein to protect the international oil markets. I think the Chairman of the Federal Reserve recommending to the President that Saddam posed a threat to the world economic system is worthy of a mention. If you still think it does not belong in the "Career" section, can you please recommend where it should go? Thanks. Ph1ll1phenry (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Framed as advice he gave the administration at the time, rather than just something he opined about later, it seems reasonably relevant to "Career". I did move it into the chronology of his time as Fed Chair, rather than a separate subsection, since that is where is other contemporary policy advice is discussed. --RL0919 (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

how to fill information[edit]

Hi I need you to help me how to fill information Ariric (talk) 06:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)