User talk:Racklever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination of Eric Marcotte for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Marcotte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Marcotte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Birbal Ram[edit]

Hello,

I only added death date from the Infobox. Please clean it up too ;) --Hsarrazin (talk) 06:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Ronnie Apteker[edit]

Hi Racklever. Can I ask why you thought it appropriate to make my Ronnie Apteker page into a redirect to Internet Solutions? The IS page does not even mention him (ironically, since he was one of the co-founders of the company). I am attempting to put together a dedicated Ronnie Apteker page and would rather people discussed its rationale and content with me before making unilateral decisions, however well-intentioned. Happy to discuss. Picknick99 (talk) 12:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

See the comments at Draft:Ronnie Apteker. --Racklever (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Allah Nazar Baloch[edit]

Hi, I am reverting your edit here[1] as this[2] shows he is still alive. Curro2 (talk) 21:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Felver[edit]

Hello Racklever. I see you have done some work on the Chrisopher Felver article. I did quite a bit of editing/research on this article recently and believe it is quite objective at this point. I do not think the note about it being a possible autobiography is relevant anymore. Also, the issue of links to/from the article is being addressed. I'l like to get your input. Thank you - and Happy New Year!Ray Jameson (talk) 03:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)