User talk:RanDom 404

RanDom 404, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RanDom 404! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. RanDom 404 (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blue Mountain Mystery has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blue Mountain Mystery was changed by RanDom 404 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984657 on 2020-12-02T20:05:07+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RanDom 404! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please transclude AfD for me., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Construction of the Titanic (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Most of this seems to be covered in the Titanic article, including costs, deck construction.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Construction of the Titanic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Construction of the Titanic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 21:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thomas & Friends.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas & Friends.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Construction of the Titanic

Hello, RanDom 404. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Construction of the Titanic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Construction of the Titanic

Hello, RanDom 404. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Construction of the Titanic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RanDom 404! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Adding fair use file to article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Newspaper listing some Titanic survivors in 1912.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Newspaper listing some Titanic survivors in 1912.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gordon Comparison.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gordon Comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Construction of the Titanic

Hello, RanDom 404. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Construction of the Titanic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that in this edit to Thomas & Friends (franchise), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Variations in English spelling

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:16, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Reallly" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Reallly has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 20 § Reallly until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Tiana draft page

I thought I would message you since you recently added edits to Draft:Tiana (TV series), to inform you that the present consensus on Talk:The Princess and the Frog#What to do about the Tiana series draft page? is to let the draft page "die out" since the series was cancelled. Historyday01 (talk) 22:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirects

Hi RanDom, I'm patrolling redirects and noticed you've been mass-creating quite a few typo redirects, such as Citiy or Evnetually. While I'm not nominating these for deletion since I don't think they're worth the trouble, I do want to gently suggest that perhaps making redirects from typos of common words is not particularly helpful. While it's conceivable someone might mistype, e.g., Mitsake, it's just as likely as any other two-letter permutation swap (WP:PANDORA) and very easy to fix. If you're interested in typos, may I suggest WP:MOSS instead :)? I did quite a bit of work there a while ago, it's fun. Rusalkii (talk) 04:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Careproctus colliculi

Hello, RanDom 404

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Careproctus colliculi, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome. I hope you enjoy helping to build the encyclopedia.

I have noticed that you, like me, create articles about fishes. Please could you read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section and also look at the guidelines in WP:Fishes?

There is no need to restate the genus in the lead section, as it is obvious to everyone once the full binomial is given. It is best to state the family, and possibly order, instead.

If there is anything I can help with, or you need further advice, just let me know!

Thanks for your work so far, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KTM Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KTM Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an individual animal that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. harrz ^talk 20:13, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@harrz @GB fan: I'm aware that when I wrote the article, I didn't actually list what made them notable, so it got A7ed. Anyway. an online search will turn up several pages of articles about Poppy. I think they are notable for an article. I created the article for no other reason than that the subject looked like it had a lot of sources. RanDom 404 (talk) 02:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you think Poppy is notable, I will restore and move the article to Draft space, see Draft:Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus). ~ GB fan 10:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an individual animal that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. harrz ^talk 22:04, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Friends of the Elephant Seal.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Friends of the Elephant Seal.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanDom 404. Thank you for your work on Vida the Vet. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:GNG. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vida the Vet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vida the Vet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vida the Vet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanDom 404. Thank you for your work on Poppy (pygmy hippopotamus). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Reaches the minimal publishable quantum, but I wonder whether it might be better to discuss both of the baby hippopotamuses at Metro Richmond Zoo for 'short text' and 'context'.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 15:47, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]