User talk:Randy Fletcher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Randy Fletcher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Katr67 19:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Oregon invitation

Oregon DEM relief map.png You are invited to join WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. You received this invitation because of your interest in Oregon and/or your edits to Oregon articles. If you would like to join, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Nice work on the Oregon articles! If you join the project, add an intro at our new intro page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon/Introductions, if you'd like, and check out the current discussions on the project talk page. There's always room for more history buffs! You'll see we've got a pretty good collection of articles on what some of us like to call Old Dead Guys that can always be expanded. :) Katr67 (talk) 04:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to second Katr's welcome, and invitation! Looks like you've done a lot of good work, thanks!! -Pete (talk) 04:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


I replied to your latest post on my talk page. Katr67 (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Eugene Pioneer Cemetery sign 2007.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eugene Pioneer Cemetery sign 2007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Eugene Pioneer Cemetery[edit]

Nice work! I just fixed it up, see what you think. If you look in the refs section in edit mode, you will see the inline refs that I have formatted for you:

<ref name=Otilla>{{cite book |author=Lay, Otilla |title=Pioneer Cemetery |publisher=Oregon Genealogical Society |location=Eugene, Oregon |date=2000}}</ref>
<ref name=Otilla/>
<ref name=Spirit>''Spirit of the Pioneer'' newsletter of the Eugene Pioneer Cemetery Association, Spring 2000.</ref>
<ref name=Spirit/>

Just paste the full citation the first time you cite the book, and the shorter citation each subsequent time. For example: Blahblahblahblah.<ref name=Otilla>{{cite book |author=Lay, Otilla |title=Pioneer Cemetery |publisher=Oregon Genealogical Society |location=Eugene, Oregon |date=2000}}</ref> Furthermore, blahblahblah.<ref name=Otilla/>

Which will look like this:

For example: Blahblahblahblah.[1] Furthermore, blahblahblah.[1]


  1. ^ a b Lay, Otilla (2000). Pioneer Cemetery. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon Genealogical Society. 

I hope that's not too confusing. Let me know if you need further help. Katr67 (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


Randy, thanks for inviting me to work on your photos…I'm not sure my skills are up to the task! Most of what I do is fix poorly-done scans of old photos, stuff off a digital camera is kind of a different animal, and I don't know too much about it. I could fiddle, but it looks like a challenge, because it's sort of washed out on one side, but good contrast on the other. I'll mess around, but can't promise much… -Pete (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Randy, this is Pete's mom. I played around with your photo of the GAR plot, I think I've improved it some, but I'm not sure. However I don't know how to send it to you to look at. If you (or Peter) can tell me, I'll do it.
On second thought - I'll send it to Pete, he'll know what to do with it from there! -- Martha (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chas capehart.jpg[edit]


Thank you for uploading File:Chas capehart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

James Barnum[edit]


This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of James Barnum, and it appears to include a substantial copy of For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Randy, thanks for creating this article. I removed the "copyright violation" message since the text that the bot thinks you copied, the Medal of Honor citation, is public domain and not copyrighted. For future reference, if you put {{hallofvalor}} at the bottom of the article, (like this for James Barnum) it will prevent CorenSearchBot from thinking it is a copyright violation. Happy editing, — jwillbur 18:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Randy I wanted to say also good job in creating articles. There has been considerable headway made into the creation of the remaining Medal of Honor recipients. I wanted to add to jwilburs comments by stating that you can also use the Army Center for Military History reference which can be found as a reference on any of the Medal of Honor lists. I also concurred with your comments regarding the removal of images from the recipients articles and left my comments seconds before you did. Cheers--Kumioko (talk) 23:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
To answer your question, if he stops removing images there is no reason to report him. If he does continue, or for future reference for yourself you can go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents to request the assistance of an Administrator. --Kumioko (talk) 23:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Medal of Honor images[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your notice. Someone else has already pointed my at that. While the template documentation at {{Infobox military person}} clearly states "image – optional – an image of the person", there seems to be a consensus to display the medal where no images of the person are avaible – a fact that I was not aware of and that is not documented in the template's manual. And as to being un-American, please have a look at my user page, I prefer to be neutral in this case, or Wikipedian, if you will. De728631 (talk) 23:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC) I have opened a thread about the medal images at Template talk:Infobox military person, so please feel free to weigh in. De728631 (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Second Battle of Fort Fisher[edit]

I notice you are almost done creating articles for the recipients of this battle. I would like to split these off into a seperate "List" of recipients and then add verbiage to the existing section of the article with a link to that list and some info about them. You can see what I am talking about by looking at this list, List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Boxer Rebellion. I think this will present the info in a better and easier to read format for users and will make the battle article read a little better than having a stack of names on it. By doing this I believe I can get the list of recipients to featured list status fairly quickly. Before I do that though I wanted to run it by you since you are the one who appears to have done much of the work on these recipients thus far. By the way I will also add it to the Medal of Honor lists template under American Civil War. --Kumioko (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

That would be great. I am very novice at creating and (especially) editing Wikipedia articles. I write magazine articles on Civil War veterans with connections to Oregon. I found the list of MOH recipients in the Wiki article on the Second Battle of Fort Fisher when I was researching Alaric Chapin. I saw that most of them had no link so I created a template and have been using the medal of honor citation as my main text. I will finish that battle and may do some more. I didn't mean to piss anyone off. I am a visual person and like the period MOH graphic.

Randy Fletcher (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Randy Fletcher

Alright then I will work on that and you are doing a fine job. Just to give you some background, a little over half the recipients have an article created with most of the remaining ones being from the Civil War. If you look here User:Kumioko/Articles to create you can see that the Spanish American war and the Peacetime recipients are almost done and then after that we are left with the indian wars and the ACW. Once the Spanam war recipients and peacetime are done I was going to start doing exactly what you are doing which is going through the ACW battle by battle, rather than alphabetical as they are broken down know. Plesae let me know if you have any questions. --Kumioko (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The Second Battle of Fort Fisher is done. I do have an interest in the Siege of Vicksburg. Have you done anything with that group? I found a good list of Medals of Honor from that campaign here Should these be listed under the Siege of Vicksburg or the Vicksburg Campaign? Randy Fletcher (talk) 21:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC) Randy Fletcher

Great Ill start working on the list in the next couple days. Good Work. In regards to the question it depends on how you want to group them. The Siege of Vicksburg was the final battle of the Vicksburg Campaign so if you want to do the whole campaign thats fine. --Kumioko (talk) 00:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok, the basic list is done, I added it to the template and removed the list of names from the battle itself. Tomorrow I will work on it some more. I need to finish filling in the table, write a couple paragraphs of what they did for the Battle page and do some formatting. I think this should be able to get this list on the road to featured status in the next couple weeks. Feel free to lend a hand if you see something that can be done. Sorry, here is the link. List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Second Battle of Fort Fisher. --Kumioko (talk) 02:52, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 16th Regiment New York Volunteer Cavalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plattsburg, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewis Phife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:GAR Statue.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:GAR Statue.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 22:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)