User talk:Rararawr21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Miss Universe 2012[edit]

Hey there! Do you mind looking for a news source that states Jeannie Mai as a presenter during the final telecast? That would be helpful, thanks! Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  -- http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/12/13/ceelo-green-and-world-series-mvp-pablo-sandoval-headline-judges-panel-for-nbcs-live-broadcast-of-the-2012-miss-universe/161674/
     It was also on the press release the judges announced, but I can't seem to find it.

Miss Universe 2013[edit]

Hello.

I deleted the french representative, and will be added untill will be confirmed.

Thanks.--Alex Duilius (talk) 21:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, your recent edits at Miss World, Miss Earth and Miss Universe did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted or removed. The information that you edited have third party verifiable and reliable sources as defined by Wikipedia. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Arielle Leira (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Miss Universe (2014)[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Miss Universe (2014) article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Boogerpatrol (talk) 00:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fyi I went ahead and opened a thread on the article name at its talkpage with a help me template to determine how to rename this: I'd tried to move it myself but the title without the parentheses appears to be "salted." Boogerpatrol (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Academy Award for Best Actor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lincoln, Robert Montgomery, Arthur Kennedy, Leslie Howard, Ronald Coleman, Gino, The Wolf of Wall Street (film) and Rooster Cogburn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MISS UNIVERSE 2014[edit]

According to the official website of the Miss Universe contest is end-DORAL FLORIDA, Miami photos are totally acceptable, geographically belongs to Miami Florida. Image of "Miami" is RELEVANT. Now that you added a reference of the US Arena if ok, that was my only contradistinction to your edit, REFERENCES ARE ESSENTIAL. Jaam0121 (talk) 01:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I invite you to read over all the documents you find on the official website of Miss Universe. The logo of the event said: "Doral-Miami", so if it is valid.Jaam0121 (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you have reverted your edit, it is because apart from such information, also you have made incorrect changes. Both images can remain a city that represents the AC plays a vital role in the event (Miami), and the other shows the compound housing the end (FIU-Doral).Jaam0121 (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2014[edit]

Hello. Officially are 90 candidates for Miss Universe 2014, you can see in [1], you count them as the official website of Miss Universe addressing so.Jaam0121 (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MISS UNIVERSE 2014[edit]

Stop. The reference is clear, the winner of Miss France 2015 in December will go to Miss Universe 2014. You must read well, although it held in 2015, MISS UNIVERSE 2014. If you do not master the Spanish is used a translator but not reviertas not sure. I do not undo. Jaam0121 (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I think that confused me, you're absolutely right, that is not going through my mind. The fact that in 2015 have two Miss Universe pageants confuses me sometimes. BUT, I still think the MU 2015 probably representative of that contest in France in 2015 is selected, taking into account that it is likely that the date is between November and December which would conflict with the French competition; however hopefully. Greetings.

Sockpuppet?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rararawr21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet, I didn't even know what that was until these accusations. This is the only account I use and I'm surprised that my username was tied with other people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rararawr21 (talkcontribs) 16:39, 20 January 2015‎

Accept reason:

Considering the evidence presented in the SPI for this specific block and the fact other socks of Riza1234 were detected by CU, as well as re-analysis of this account's contributions, I have accepted this unblock request since the socking accusations are not "beyond reasonable doubt"; let's see how things go from this point on. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  22:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rararawr21, I am wondering how it came to be that you are posting an autoblock unblock template. Which account were you editing as when you got the autoblock template? It is not shown if you are using the same account as was blocked. Chillum 17:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also for your reference the evidence against you can be found here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mrdhimas/Archive. I would be interested in your opinion on the facts of the evidence and quality of the evidence. Chillum 17:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I clicked the edit button while not logged in and it said my IP address was blocked and that is how I first came to notice that I had been blocked for being a sockpuppet of Riza. Perhaps I did use the wrong template though, I'm not really sure how this process is supposed to go about. I'm not really sure how to defend myself except say that this is the only account I have ever used to make edits, so I'm not sure how my username got tied in with Riza or the other usernames that were banned. I don't even usually make changes to information, I usually just make grammatical changes. Do you have any ideas of how I should proceed? Rararawr21 (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will ping @Bbb23:, @HJ Mitchell: and @Salvidrim!: as they were all involved in the discussion leading up to your block. I am hoping one of you could draw attention to the specific behavioral evidence in this case. Chillum 22:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Considering the evidence presented in the SPI for this specific block and the fact other socks of Riza1234 were detected by CU, as well as re-analysis of this account's contributions, I have accepted this unblock request since the socking accusations are not "beyond reasonable doubt"; let's see how things go from this point on. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  22:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick response. Chillum 23:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm glad this misunderstanding has been sorted out. Rararawr21 (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Rararawr21. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rararawr21. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]