User talk:RedProofHill123

2009 and 2017

There is no inauguration in 2017. We were arguing about the election in 2016, and consensus seems to be to include, in spite of standards. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

See also wikt:en route. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

In order for an event to be listed in recent year articles, it must be reported independently on three continents. If there is a Wikipedia article on it, the references possibly need not be listed in the entry.

Also, on each of your additions, you have added blank lines on both sides. This violates WP:ACCESS, which clearly implies that there should be no blank lines within lists. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Your recent editing history at American Airlines shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Separate articles for trainsets

Hi there. I noticed you're posting more-or-less the exact same message on many different transit lines' talk pages, requesting that certain train and car models get separate articles. Unfortunately, these articles would not fulfill the WP:NOTABLE guideline, which is essential for an article to exist. Most of the articles you're requesting are for train models that are not used at all outside of a single line in a single city. There simply isn't enough to say about them, and reliable sources barely cover them, if at all. If you can't back up an article with reliable sources, the articles will be declined for inclusion, unfortunately. What I would suggest is to read up on Wikipedia's guidelines to see why these articles wouldn't be the best idea. I know it's a bummer, but Wikipedia is for reliable, source-able, and notable information. The kind of detail you're trying to include would probably be best suited for an independent wiki that is specifically meant for transit, if such a website exists, because other wikis won't hold themselves to the same standard of reliability as Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any questions. BruzerFox 23:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

American Airlines Flight 191

I see that you have made the same edit multiple times on American Airlines Flight 191 in the past 24 hours. This edit was discussed on the talk page in a discussion that you initiated, and the responding editors disagreed with your proposed edit. Please do not make an edit after the issue is raised on the talk page, unless the talk page consensus supports it. Otherwise this could be viewed as edit warring (especially if you keep trying to make the same edit repeatedly), and you could have negative action taken against you in the future. Shelbystripes (talk) 06:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bejeweled Stars (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bejeweled Stars (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker^talk 06:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bejeweled Stars (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

American Airlines Flight 191 31-DEC-2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at American Airlines Flight 191, you may be blocked from editing. As you well know, all is a trivial qualifier not to be used in infobox cells which already feature numeric quantities, per: H:IB Spintendo ᔦᔭ 23:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

It's good to keep things even across all pages. I'm not vandalizing if it's true.RedProofHill123 (talk) 00:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that I fixed the formatting of your message to be more readable for others. Anyway, it's important to take into account the discussions on the talk page. Until consensus is reached - and it seems to me like the consensus is against your changes - then you shouldn't add "all". Wikipedia works this way because Wikipedia is a community effort, and your habit of ignoring other editors is telling me that you don't care for working with the community. BruzerFox 06:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bejeweled Stars (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ernestchuajiasheng was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RedFlame (talk) 12:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siemens LRV4 (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siemens LRV4 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Siemens LRV4, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker^talk 06:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MBTA Green Line Type 8 (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA Green Line Type 8 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MBTA Green Line Type 8, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8 (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MadeYourReadThis was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MadeYourReadThis (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MBTA CRRC 01400 Series (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA CRRC 01400 Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MBTA CRRC 01400 Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bejeweled Stars (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TeaDrinker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bejeweled Stars, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TeaDrinker (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I reworded some sections of your article Draft:MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8 and added newspaper references - please have a look over it and check that I didn't miss anything. Good luck getting it through! SpaceInnovader (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Your recent editing history at American Airlines Flight 191 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC) But I’m doing it right I’m don’t knoe why you guys are saying it’s wrong it’s not far I think CNG Bot needs to watch this and automatically add all back if got removed. How can I tell CNG bot to watch it?

Your submission at Articles for creation: MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8 has been accepted

MBTA AnsaldoBreda Type 8, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

RedProofHill123 (talk) 01:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC) I already summited another one because the tile can't be changed after when its created so i had to copy and paste it into another article for a better name. About this one not sure why users says it in Arabic. It's english spelling. I selected English one too for the draft.

Behavior on New Technology Train

Your behavior on the article New Technology Train is concerning, to say the least. Other editors becoming frustrated with you is not going to get them blocked, as you say. What may get attention from administrators, however, is persistent addition of incorrect information, and antagonistic, almost obsessively-protective behavior, which you have been doing on multiple articles. You do not own articles. If this continues, it could lead to a block for you. Continuing like this may lead other editors to report you. Please remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and the voices of other editors matter; In this case, other editors pointed out that you were wrong, and you didn't handle that maturely at all. BruzerFox 17:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Being "rude" is what you were doing. You were ignoring the input of others and adding false information. Any admin would see the history page on that article and know that the other editors were frustrated at you for a good reason.BruzerFox 01:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

RedProofHill123 (talk) 02:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Ok I might have been a little rude, but the information was true because I saw it before. Lots of people have seen it there are R160 R trains, R143 J trains, R68A G W N trains. Youtuber's say to me "you rely too much on the websites when I have seen it myself and they also say Wiki is not a reliable source.

YouTube is not a reliable source at all, though. You have to find sources that back themselves up with information. You can't just post whatever you find online on fansites and YouTube pages. BruzerFox 19:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Hayman30. An edit that you recently made to Carousel (musical) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hayman30 (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

I am surprised you thought your edit to the Template:Infobox station documentation here to justify your edit here would go unnoticed. That is definitively not how things are done at Wikipedia. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

RedProofHill123 (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Actually what Im doing is helping improve information on wiki. What your doing is disruptive by removing improvements. Lots of cities infoboxes have this and they don't get removed, you or anyone does not own articles.

Your recent editing history at Air France Flight 66 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

TWA Flight 800

Multiple editors oppose the use of "all" in that infobox, as do the instructions for that template, which explicitly state: When the total_survivors parameter is zero do not add "(all)", as it is redundant. Template:Infobox_aircraft_occurrence You seem to be the only editor that is in favor. If you want to include the "all" in that infobox, you'll need to get consensus for it at the article's talk page. If you continue to add that without gaining consensus, I will have to report it to the edit warring noticeboard, which will likely result in your being blocked from editing. Geogene (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC) RedProofHill123 (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC) But I thought it does not really matter all is something useful I thought.

Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for as you clearly continued to edit war after the warnings on this talk page which has now moved on to being disruptive. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MilborneOne (talk) 07:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Im kinda concerned why im blocked, I was trying to improve wiki not vandilize it.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 16:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)I should be unblocked because the edits ive made were constructive, the other users are not being nice to me and saying that im terrible, I edit to make people not confused, and other editors dont seem to care.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring. You shouldn't edit war even if you think you're right. Instead, you should establish a consensus on the talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 20:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)We need to talk to 2 users: Spitendo and Ahunt because my block was unnecessary and was a dumb reason to get blocked, we already discussed this, and saying redundant is not a excuse for this. What Im saying is that im trying to improve things on wiki.

Decline reason:

This neither addresses nor excuses your edit warring. I'm really concerned you aren't seeing this. You had plenty of warning, and now three admins have reviewed your unblock requests and declined them. Yamla (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8

Hello, RedProofHill123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC) RedProofHill123 (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC) I wish you can unblock me, also for some reason you cant change the name after creating a new page, so I had to make a new one and copy and paste the sources from the old to the new article.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "RedProofHill123". The reason given for RedProofHill123's block is: "Disruptive editing".

• Blocking administrator: MilborneOne (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: That looks as if you attempted to evade your block. Please don't do that. Huon (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7.5 (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7.5 (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RedProofHill123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Checking needed

Please see WT:WikiProject Trains#Checking needed. Johnuniq (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

About R143 and R188 Subway page

R143 is not replace by R42 and R40 and R188 is not replace by R62A either I know you fix it on R143 and please fix the R188 also it has to be reverted done. 69.94.58.75 (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5

Hello, RedProofHill123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Atrium Mall (Newton, MA)

Hello, RedProofHill123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atrium Mall (Newton, MA), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Barack Obama 2012 presidential campaign endorsements, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Atrium Mall (Newton, MA)

Hello, RedProofHill123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atrium Mall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Station nightclub fire. Binksternet (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)