User talk:RegentsPark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Jalpaiguri page problem[edit]

please, help!!_the page is just getting reverted again & again!! :'( :(

Attention required[edit]

Hy there. Sir, can you please see to edits like these and these? They arent quite inclined to discuss the issue either. Uploading copyvio images, removing sourced content and editing a single topic area-seems like an SPA. Thanks.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 11:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi TripWire. I don't have time to look at this in detail but am watching the page and will take action if the editor crosses the line. On this particular edit, they're not there yet. --regentspark (comment) 12:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 12:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Ref this Sir, this is getting out of hand. Please see to it, I dont want to waste my and admin's time on ANI over this,—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ʞlɐʇ 18:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

2005 Jaunpur train bombing[edit]

Why are you posting this on my talk page?--regentspark (comment) 14:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imperial Airways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Thanks DPL bot. --regentspark (comment) 14:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

I will create a new page[edit]

Hi --regentspark ,718smiley.svg
As my articles Senorita India was deleted for having lack of references, what should I do if I want to create it again. I promise that this time I will create the article with many reliable references. Please can you help me.Face-sad.svg
CyberBrinda (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

I've restored it User:CyberBrinda/Senorita India 2016. Best to build it here and then use the WP:AFC process to submit it for verification and recreation. Do note that it should be substantially different from the deleted version otherwise it will just get deleted again. --regentspark (comment) 20:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


Hi, Bishnois needs to be moved back to Bishnoi because we use the singular for communities. I can't do it, so please could you? - Sitush (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done --regentspark (comment) 21:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Yay. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 23:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan By James Tod[edit]

Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan By James Tod is not an accepted source? (2600:1002:B01C:BCE4:E93A:E3B4:890A:E0C7 (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC))

Not for history. You need to use modern academic sources for articles on history. @Sitush: is probably the person to contact on this. --regentspark (comment) 16:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


Virtually nothing useful is coming from anons at Aam Aadmi Party. It has, of course, been semi-protected in the past. Do you think another dose of that would work or should I consider something different - pending changes, 500/30 etc? - Sitush (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) If the disruption has gone on long enough, an admin would probably consider indefinite pending changes or semi, which should do the job. You need community consensus for 500/30, I believe, which might not be worth the trouble. Vanamonde (talk) 11:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
I've semi-protected it for now but will take a closer look later today. --regentspark (comment) 12:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Kashmir conflict editing restriction[edit]

How to go about a simple revert per NPOV like reverting this with this 1RR restriction? Specially when edits are done by multiple anon editors ([1], [2], [3], [4]). --SMS Talk 16:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Try WP:RFPP; there is certainly disruptive editing going on there. Vanamonde (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Pinging NeilN, who once had an idea of using the ARBPIA version of 1RR, which allows 3RR for anonymous edits. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
SMS, the general idea is that you don't have to revert it yourself. Someone else will do it sooner or later since this is a highly trafficked article. I wouldn't block you for this but that doesn't mean that some other admin wouldn't so better to play it safe. --regentspark (comment) 19:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Also, you should warn the IP that this is disruptive editing. If they continue, then that would be a good case for a block (or protection if the IP hops around). --regentspark (comment) 19:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Uri attack[edit]

Is it possible that you may have left the message at the wrong user's page? You left a message here, even thought that user merely moved the content around. The deletion of the content happened in this reversion. I'm sorry if I come across as rude. I'm not trying to tell you how what to do. Just giving you a heads up.VR talk 22:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


Ravana page is constantly being vandalized by user User:K.shayanthan, who keeps removing various source contents. I have already told him that Ravana appears in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism (Jain version of Ramnaya) but he keeps removing the sources. On top of that, he seems to be pushing some pesodo-history of eelam nationalism.

He also seems to have vandalisted, removed various source contents from other wikipedia pages, where Buddhist stupa is being pushed as "tomb" of some Chola rule, see here (talk) 10:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ravana is not mentioned in any of the cited sources. Look for a source that relates the two (e.g., [5]) and then tailor the sentence so that it reflects what the source says. --regentspark (comment) 12:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, RegentsPark. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

I have good hopes ....[edit]

Come above Nationality, Ethnicity, Creed ....

This message is written in good faith .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Naming issue[edit]

Hi RP, I have been wanting for a while to create a section in 2016 Uri attack titled something likek "Indo-Pakistani diplomatic war". But I didn't feel like using the term "war". Can you think of an alternative? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Not sure I can help. 'War of words'? 'Conflict'? Diplomatic war is a fairly standard phrase, I think. --regentspark (comment) 12:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


Hi RegentsPark. We have a fellow IP [6] [7] who is going around making unsourced edits to articles, including possible BLP violations. I left a note on their talk stressing the importance of reliable sources, but they do not seem to pay heed. They've also just reverted back their edits and I've no incentive to edit war. Could you look into this, including a possible protection of the pages concerned? Thanks! Mar4d (talk) 15:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Where exactly is the WP:BPL violation on Seema Mustafa? Please point it out. On the contrary, the BPL violation is clearly evident in this edit made REPEATEDLY by Mar4d, where he insists on naming a certain Indian organization / person as the "perpetrator" of a mass murder when that allegation has not been proven in court or anywhere else -- in fact, a Paki terror outfit is the latest suspect, and probably that is what your Paki friend is intent upon covering up. I do not ask that the terror outfit should be named as perpetrator, only that no party should be named until there is some confirmation. That is the definition and essence of BPL / defamation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Protected by Airplaneman. 59.182, please note that any unsourced edit in a blp is subject to immediate deletion and repeatedly adding them back to an article is considered disruptive and will lead to blocks (and/or protection). --regentspark (comment) 15:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)