User talk:Ren Sydrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


It's all good. I'm more than willing to bury the hatchet. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Why is the Jediism entry up for deletion? It seems like Wikipedia just can't stand it. What do we need to do? Br.John.Henry.Phelan (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Looks like we held off the AfD. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


Thanks Ren for fending off the obsessive and persistent I had not looked in for a while and was surprised. I will join you in the reverting. Obviously this article will continue to be the target of POV fanatics from time to time. Naturalistic (talk) 19:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Ren, the Pantheism article still needs more work on Hinduism and Taoism, however I feel that it might be "graduated" beyond the multiple issues warning. Please consider removing or toning down that tag. Also the level of references is creeping up to a reasonable level. BTW, how does one get the Wiki power to add tags like that? --Naturalistic (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ren, we have another person Allisgod in an edit war in the Pantheism article, inserting a non-existent category of Pantheism (Classical) based on an inaccurate reading of Raphson who first used the word (in Latin). Any assistance or advice you can provide will be appreciated. If the article is frozen, I want to make sure it is frozen in an accurate state. --Naturalistic (talk) 02:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Religious Naturalism[edit]

Ren, your vigorous and determined approach may be needed at Religious Naturalism where jlrobertson has created the kind of mess that was found at Neo-Pantheism. It is sheer OR and POV, he adds under Religious Naturalism people who never used the word, added "Religious Naturalism communities" that never used the word, removed warning tags and much much else. Ditto for the article Spiritual Naturalism which has been crafted by jlrobertson into a vehicle for promoting Religious Naturalism. --Naturalistic (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

On further consideration, perhaps what really needs watching is the way in which jlrobertson has been cunningly building up an empire out of Religious Naturalism - creating many biographies, some of which probably do not qualify under the "notability" criterion, and creating a whole category which is aiming to "swallow up" a lot of other approaches (including panentheism) under the pretext that they are versions of his preferred option Religious Naturalism. I am following this but may sometimes need guidance on entering the higher reaches :D --Naturalistic (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Ren, take a look at what jlrobertson has done to Religious Naturalism - removing all tags, reverting much deleted material, compounding all the many faults that were there before. I have restored the tags, but maybe this user needs disciplining in some way? That's an area I have no knowledge of. --Naturalistic (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


Hey, do you reckon you'll be able to restore all the references on the Jediism page? I would, but I'm still a newbie so I don't know how I would go about it :P

May the Force be with you, Kai Tatsu (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Hi Ren, little while without speaking.. You been okay? Kai Tatsu (talk) 20:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
    • Hey Ren, how's it going? on the Jediism page, there are still a lack of references - I checked the history, and there are 23 references as of 30th October 2009, so maybe if you could put these back in to the article? Thanks! Kai Tatsu (talk) 08:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)