User talk:Reneedowning55

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi! Thanks for the message. I have already made changes to the current disambiuation page, which is all we have at this point. They are strictly factual -- some information was not correct (Miami is no longer under construction -- it opened last year).

I am trying to construct a main page for Cr on my userpage. Is there a process by which this can be reviewed? Of course the people I work for would like to use wiki as a marketing tool, but they understand that that's not going to happen. However, we would like to be as present on Wikipedia as many of the companies we deal with are -- for example, Oceania Cruises, Cunard, The Palazzo in Las vegas, etc. (Actuallly, less present, since my boss does not want our logo or any photos posted.) Reneedowning55 (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for getting back to me. Ultimately I think everything you just said probably puts any edits you make into jeopardy. Despite you saying otherwise it does sound as if you are here to further the interests of your employer and that is not allowed and could ultimately end up with you from being blocked. I would recommend correcting glaring mistakes, such as you have done, but allowing third parties to add information. If the subject matter (in this case Canyon Ranch) is notable, then people will go ahead and add content, if it is not then people won't, and ultimately that is a good indication that the article is no tnotable enough for inclusion. Do what you want, it is up to you, but as I said, it sounds as if you're here for the wrong reasons. Sorry. RaseaC (talk) 18:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, you asked for advice and I didn't give it. I've had a quick look at your userpage and I think there is a bit too much marketing talk there, but that's my opinion. You may find Wikipedia:Content noticeboard helpful, ultimately it's there to allow unaffiliated third parties to review content. Might I suggest you put forward your proposals and wait for feedback? RaseaC (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Once i finish plowing through the html tangles I will follow your advice and go to the content noticeboard. I'll also make some cuts -- I take your point about notability. Maybe I will talk to my boss and see if he will just let the whole thing drop. My fault for bringing it up in the first place. . . .Reneedowning55 (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan, I would play down the whole working for RC thing when you get the the noticeboard though, you'll probably find that alone is enough reason to delete your edits. RaseaC (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind advice.Reneedowning55 (talk) 21:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Canyon Ranch[edit]

I would advise you to be incredibly careful before editing the Canyon Ranch page given what you have posted on your userpage. Please ensure you are farmiliar with all WP policies including, but not limited to COI to ensure I don't have to put my lightning-fast revert action to the test. Thanks, I look forward to Canyon Ranch not being changed any time in the near future. RaseaC (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


Ambox warning pn.svg
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Canyon Ranch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DR04 (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)