User talk:Reywas92

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


66th Oscars (1994)[edit]

Hi, and happy new year. I've resumed improving Oscar ceremony lists now that I'm done with Christmas, I was hoping if you can give me opinions and comments on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1 as you have done for my other Oscar ceremonies? I would like to receive feedback so I could make necessary improvements. Regards.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

RE: 66th Oscars[edit]

Hi there,

I addressed your concerns regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1 and I made some corrections.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

RE: HIMYM Season 1[edit]

Hello, I addressed your concerns regarding the Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/How I Met Your Mother (season 1)/archive1 candidacy. I hope everything looks good; if not, can you please provide any further guidance? Thank you for your review! --haha169 (talk) 07:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

71st Oscars (1999)[edit]

Hi, I was hoping if you can give me opinions and comments for the 71st Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/71st Academy Awards/archive1 as you have done for my other Oscar ceremonies? I would like to receive feedback so I could make necessary improvements. I truly appreciate your help. Thanks.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

74th Oscars (2002)[edit]

Hi, I understand you are busy, but would you please proofread the 74th Academy Awards regarding Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/74th Academy Awards/archive1 as you have done for my other Oscar ceremonies? I would like to receive feedback so I could make necessary improvements. I truly appreciate your help. Thanks.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Please remember[edit]

That per WP:BRD you are to undertake a dialogue with other editors when your bold changes are reverted and not Edit War. Please also note that until content disputes are resolved the Status Quo before the dispute is maintained until a new consensus is agreed on. MisterShiney 23:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Correct. I'm surprised that an experienced editor like Reywas92 would edit war like this. Per BRD they should stick to the talk page at Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series) and get consensus before attempting such a change, especially since it has been challenged. Those subheadings are standard practice and not worth fighting over. Keep the status quo version. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

1998 and 2002 Oscars[edit]

Hi there,

Sorry if you are busy, but would you please (if possible) proofread the 70th Academy Awards and 74th Academy Awards? I would greatly appreciate the feedback. Thanks.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

RE:1998 Oscars[edit]

Hi there,

I fixed everything you have suggested regarding the 70th Academy Awards for featured list consideration.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 07:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

2013 Oscars[edit]

Hello there,

If you have any spare time, would you kindly check 85th Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

2007 Oscars[edit]

Hello there,

If you have any spare time, would you kindly check 79th Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

2003 Oscars[edit]

Hello there,

If you have any spare time, would you kindly check 75th Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

2014 Academy Awards[edit]

Hello there,

would you kindly proofread 86th Academy Awards for featured list status? I would appreciate the help very much.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 02:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

2014 Oscars corrections[edit]

Hi, I made some changes according to your suggestions. Thank you very much for your help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

59th Oscars (1987)[edit]

Hello there,

If you have any spare time, would you kindly check 59th Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the help.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876[edit]

Hi Reywas92- Thanks again for your initial copy-edits. I wondered if you might think about reviewing this list at FLC, time and topic-interest permitting... Many thanks--Godot13 (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Kick the bucket[edit]

Before there was plumbing, prisoners would have a latrine pail. They would flip it upside down, stand on it, and hang themselves. They would then kick the bucket out from under their feet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.189.33.188 (talk) 00:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Limmat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • centre of the [[city of Zurich]]. From Zurich it flows in a northwesterly direction, after 35 km] reaching the river [[Aare]]. The confluence is located north of the small town of [[Brugg, Aargau|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Recent removal[edit]

You seem to have a larger issue with the content of election articles and/or how they are set up in general. I'd suggest you start a request for comment if you want to not see that sort of thing on election articles in general. 331dot (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:CT table-related templates[edit]

Category:CT table-related templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States presidential election, 2016 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • that they are running, though that does not necessarily equate with viability as a candidate.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Infobox academic division[edit]

Please reconsider, or revert, your closure at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 8#Template:Infobox academic division, which offers no reasoning, and appears to be a vote count rather than an appraisal of the discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:33, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Do you intend to respond? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Nope. The TFD was running for three weeks, and I found the oppose arguments convincing. You're perfectly welcome to do template transitions on your own (Autowikibrowser may be able to help), make a new TFD, or ask another admin. Reywas92Talk 06:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks[edit]

Thank you for the many thanks you've sent, Reywas92. I appreciate that someone recognizes the effort. I'd be interested in learning how to thank someone in the same fashion. Cheers and happy new year! Yoho2001 (talk) 13:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Leelah's Law[edit]

Hi Reywas92. I reverted your redirect of Leelah's Law because there is a nine day old merge discussion here: talk:Death of Leelah Alcorn#Merge Leelah's Law. As you can see, the merge/redirect is controversial, with three options on the table. The discussion should remain in place for 30 days and be closed formally by an uninvolved admin.- MrX 11:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electoral history of Hillary Rodham Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Workers Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal government of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (state) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Happy birthday![edit]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Canvassing[edit]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.

ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.