User talk:Riley124

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Image copyright problem with Image:CooperT56.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CooperT56.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Image:CooperT56.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikieditor06 (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Andrew Leonard Voullaire Campbell[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Andrew Leonard Voullaire Campbell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 20:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Andrew Leonard Voullaire Campbell[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Andrew Leonard Voullaire Campbell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 20:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Re deletion[edit]

Hi, to have a biographical article on Wikipedia the person must be notable. That means that s/he must be subject (and not just a passing mention) of reliable third-party publications (like newspaper articles, books, etc). See notability guidelines for more detail. The article that you wrote did not establish that. It just established that there was such a person (which is not enough). Quick search on Google and on Google books did not find any meaningful results. It might be that he is just an obscure personality not easily found on search engines. If you think that this is the case and you would like to continue working on the article I will restore it in your userspace (for example at user:Riley124/Campbell. But without clear proof of notability and without proper citation of your sources, the article will not be restored in the "main space." Renata (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Andrew Leonard Voullaire Campbell[edit]

The page I deleted only had the {{hangon}} tag and no other content. The actual content was deleted by User:Renata3, who I see has already commented above. ... discospinster talk 22:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

File:CooperT56.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:CooperT56.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Cooper T65/T67[edit]

Hi Riley124 and welcome to Wikipedia! You seem to be knowledgeable about Cooper Formula Junior cars. If so, are you able to explain to me the relationship/difference between the T65 and the T67? This webpage seems to suggest that they are essentially the same car. Is it perhaps the case that the original showcar was called the T65, but the production models were called T67? Or was it related to whether or not the car had the Hydrolastic suspension? Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)