User talk:Ringbang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


14:14:54, 2 June 2016 review of submission by Ahuang8[edit]


I thought there are already quite a lot of external links. OriGene Technologies has close to 70M revenue and lots of offices over the world.

I read through the Wikipedia:Notability section and feel like OriGene Technologies page meets the guideline. There are quite a lot of guidelines given. Can you please let me know which part I need to improve? Thanks a lot.

00:36:07, 19 June 2016 review of submission by Wilton96[edit]


Multiple, non-primary references and external links have been added to the article.

14:03:12, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Nicwin10[edit]


Hello Ringbang,

I am a new user and would really like to edit this to make it an acceptable page. Could you please give me some guidance on what content I can change to diminish the "promotional" quality? Any other advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

16:01:55, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Eddwagner[edit]


Am not sure if I have any good reliable sources or if I need to remove certain ones. Thank you Edd

02:28:17, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Jacopobelbo1234[edit]


The article is well-sourced, does not include any superlative statements, so I have difficulty understanding which parts read as "puffery." Can you please specify?

17:37:40, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Elvisbrandenburgkremmen[edit]


I don't understand the hesitance of wikipedia mods in cases like this. A short technical stub article is in effect better than nothing. Asking for a full rewrite simply causes author to not put information up, leaving the public with a loss of valuable information.

A case of "i don't work for you".

File:Screenshot of the WorldCat.org homepage, 29 March 2017.png listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot of the WorldCat.org homepage, 29 March 2017.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutral notice[edit]

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)