- 1 14:14:54, 2 June 2016 review of submission by Ahuang8
- 2 00:36:07, 19 June 2016 review of submission by Wilton96
- 3 14:03:12, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Nicwin10
- 4 16:01:55, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Eddwagner
- 5 02:28:17, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Jacopobelbo1234
- 6 17:37:40, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Elvisbrandenburgkremmen
- 7 Come and join us at the Wiknic
- 8 Wiki Loves Pride 2017
- 9 We're on Twitter!
- 10 Your GA nomination of TransGeneration
- 11 Your GA nomination of TransGeneration
- 12 Five Satans listed at Redirects for discussion
14:14:54, 2 June 2016 review of submission by Ahuang8
I thought there are already quite a lot of external links. OriGene Technologies has close to 70M revenue and lots of offices over the world.
I read through the Wikipedia:Notability section and feel like OriGene Technologies page meets the guideline. There are quite a lot of guidelines given. Can you please let me know which part I need to improve? Thanks a lot.
00:36:07, 19 June 2016 review of submission by Wilton96
Multiple, non-primary references and external links have been added to the article.
14:03:12, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Nicwin10
I am a new user and would really like to edit this to make it an acceptable page. Could you please give me some guidance on what content I can change to diminish the "promotional" quality? Any other advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
16:01:55, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Eddwagner
Am not sure if I have any good reliable sources or if I need to remove certain ones. Thank you Edd
02:28:17, 5 February 2017 review of submission by Jacopobelbo1234
The article is well-sourced, does not include any superlative statements, so I have difficulty understanding which parts read as "puffery." Can you please specify?
17:37:40, 27 February 2017 review of submission by Elvisbrandenburgkremmen
I don't understand the hesitance of wikipedia mods in cases like this. A short technical stub article is in effect better than nothing. Asking for a full rewrite simply causes author to not put information up, leaving the public with a loss of valuable information.
A case of "i don't work for you".
Come and join us at the Wiknic
|LA Meetup: 6th Wiknic, 7/15 @ Pan Pacific Park|
Dear fellow Wikipedian,
You are cordially invited to the 6th Los Angeles Wiknic, a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is planned for Pan-Pacific Park and will be held on Saturday, July 15, 2017 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!
Wiki Loves Pride 2017
You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
We're on Twitter!
|WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
RachelWex 17:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of TransGeneration
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article TransGeneration you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 00:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: Right in the middle of Pride month: Thank you and good timing! —Ringbang (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of TransGeneration
The article TransGeneration you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:TransGeneration for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagecandor -- Sagecandor (talk) 23:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Five Satans listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Five Satans. Since you had some involvement with the Five Satans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)