Jump to content

User talk:robertsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tech News: 2024-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:16, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Avemalakoff (13:15, 5 October 2024)

[edit]

Hello: Thanks for your help. There is a new book on the mystery about the Man in the Iron Mask written by me, Sarah Madry, M.Ed. On the Wikipedia page on this topic there is a list of books about this topic. I would like to have my book listed on the list. Since the editors investigate, quite normally and appropriately, the level of accuracy and seriousness of authors and material that appear on Wikipedia (I depend upon you to do that as a regular user of Wikipedia - thank you), I wrote to another editor who responded to me about adding my book to the list about the depth of my research and the new paths covered on the subject. I think that was interpreted as a promotion of my book that I intended to put on the Wikipedia page. I don't want to promote my book, unless putting the book on the list of other books, is promotion. I wanted to show the editor that my book is a serious work that offers dependable new material. I am sorry if that was the wrong thing to do. I have never done this before and I didn't know I was not supposed to do this. I apologize. I hope Wikipedia will be able to list my book as a book on this topic. Sarah Madry --Avemalakoff (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI vs WMF

[edit]

Your Signpost article made me wonder why we didn't have Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation. Now we do. I love it when that happens, so thanks! Valereee (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee, personally I prefer to have WMF-related legal cases (even though it is uncommon compared to the other legal cases that are written here) only to be written in the mainspace after the case is over for various reasons. One of the many reasons is its potential to influence ongoing cases, like so; potentially shutting off/opening up possible legal strategies that trial lawyers (on both sides, and now the judiciary as a whole apparently?) can apply and whatever extra scrutiny it may place on our fellow editors living the country. But hey... what's done is done. – robertsky (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nonetheless, thanks for the article since it now presents a timeline. – robertsky (talk) 10:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I feel like not writing it until the case is settled is self-censoring. There's a huge amount of coverage, and I tried to follow it very carefully. And it's a not-unimportant case. And being not in India, I'm safe from being directly threatened personally even if my personal details were released.
Would be kind of a bummer if I got invited to an Indian wedding, although I'd have an incredibly interesting decline reason: "Sorry, I've got an open warrant there". Which almost would make it worth missing even a fabulous Indian wedding. Valereee (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee I get where you are coming from. Let's hope that this does not blow up further. – robertsky (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI vs WP

[edit]

I really like the heading "The court reads", thanks for the chuckle. As another court in India noted at one point,[13] WP is not a reliable source and legal stuff should not be based on it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]