User talk:Romazur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Romazur, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 22:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Poeticbent talk 03:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

That's a bit strange what has happened. Edit war, what's this??? First of all, what's the point with "promoting own pictures"? Promoting for what? This is Wikipedia, you edit it to fill in the gap of missing facts you see, nothing else. This is not a National Gallery, this is a source of facts. When I see something missing, I try do my best to change this. I don't say my pictures are best. I say I take pictures of something still missing on Wikipedia. So, why not to take a better picture by yourself or asking for a better picture somebody else? As you can see, I never fight here. Logical arguments do talk to me... Pictures of Royal cypher or Canary Wharf were taken with a poor quality devices. But they were real, they showed how that part of the reality looked like in that time. Ravenor park is just a nice picture, just showing Ravenor park in autumn, don't you think in the depth of your mind? The same way goes POLIN taken - in fact - with iPhone 6S Plus. Picture shows what other ones don't, yet. Maybe take a better picture of the museum seen towards it's address spot and then remove the picture I took. Doing it now deprives Wikipedia readers quite crucial bunch of facts relating to the exterior and surrounding area. Picture shows what is real, doesn't it? And by the way, in relation to the time you spent for this 'investigation', dear Colleague, you feel somehow more right now? Don't catch this idea of yours. Maybe take into account once again, please, it is Wikipedia - source of real facts, not a gallery - source of our own, private impressions. Kind regards, R.