User talk:Roxy the dog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Edits on Alternative cancer treatment[edit]

Hi Roxy the dog, I saw you reverted a student's edit on Alternative cancer treatment. I left them some feedback encouraging them to make smaller edits and discuss on the talk page first what their intentions are. Could you be more specific on what the problem was with their editing though? Your edit summary was somewhat vague. This will help me leave more specific feedback. Thanks, Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

That's very diplomatically expressed. It's late here, I'll open a section on the article Talk page in the morning. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 00:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I see that Doc James is helping at the article and the Talk page. Any input from me at the moment would be superfluous, though I watch the page. I also commented at the students talk page, and pointed out the reason for my revert, and I dont think that edsum is vague at all! -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 09:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Himalayan salt[edit]

Hi Roxy, I saw that updates which have been made by me on October, 25th has been removed. I would like to ask what was the reason of removal these changes. All updates were made based on the polish version and supported with appropriate references. I would be grateful for feedback. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJetka (talkcontribs) 15:41, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @TJetka: Your edits added un-sourced or poorly-sourced content (in some but not all cases) with the goal of refuting health benefits of Himalayan salt. You cited pl-wiki once. You added a link to an image that doesn't exist. I suspect that the sources cited, even if reliable, don't support your assertions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
I was very pleased with my edit, and remain so. I'm sorry about the edsum, which says "Ot an improvement", it should have said "Not an improvement" -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 17:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. - David Gerard (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Chronic Lyme[edit]

See WP:ANI § Chronic Lyme Guy (help!) 11:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Wait, I am having a vision, I forsee a POVWarrior out to make sure the Chronic Lyme article reflects their clearly and obviously a disease, rather than the scientific consensus... Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
If I have interpreted your grammatically confused sentence correctly, it could not be further from the truth. Sthatdc (talk) 12:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Odd, that makes a change. Usually its people wanting to source woo and over-fluff articles with material from dubious publications. (I get the above reads confused, I was in a hurry and I think I left out some words mid-sentence. And now I cant remember what they were going to be). Only in death does duty end (talk) 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
I have had that on my watchlist for ages. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 19:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


You've reached the WP:3RR limit on your edit war at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science, and the discussion has gone beyond the useful limit. I would recommend backing down. It would be a shame to have to block someone over something so inconsequential. Please desist. --Jayron32 14:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Best to stop now and let the system work. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gem fr reported by User:Guy Macon (Result: ). I have to admit that I lost my cool when I saw repeated attempts to retain wrong information while hatting the correction. One shouldn't use templates to remove one side of a content dispute. That being said, the answer to edit warring is not edit warring right back, and I shouldn't have done that. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
That's right guys: you need to remain chilled - chilled as microwaved ice. Alexbrn (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
I see what you did there. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 18:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Not to worry. the microwaves are everywhere. I feel warmer already. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

November 2019[edit]

Information icon Hey User - I know you are a part of discussions and Before reverting any edits. Try to participate and contribute something to prove yourself.Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Siddha medicine, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Please stop your disruptive editing and see WP:BRD and WP:CON. (talk) 22:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC), perhaps my essay at WP:1AM will be helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


I wanted to vote Scottish Nationalist, but they dont stand here!! -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 21:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Silly Roxy, dogs aren't allowed to vote. Other than in Chicago, of course. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)