This user has signed Jimbo's guestbook
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:Royalmate1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  • The only errors that have been done are against me. The Wikipedia community is a joke and there needs to be purge of Wikipedia administrators and the Arbitration Committee needs to be disbanded. Only then can real reform be hoped for the site. Until then, I apologize for nothing, and I await the immediate repeal of my indefinite block. RoyalMate1 02:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Crystal Clear app linneighborhood.png
Crystal Clear app email.png
Vista-system.svg
Accessories-text-editor.svg
Userpage
Talk
Random
Contributions
AnimWIKISTAR-laurier-WT.gifWelcomebanner.gif
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
University of Central Florida WikiProject This user is a member of WikiProject University of Central Florida, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of the University of Central Florida on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us.

respecting image copyrights

Hi, many images on your userpages (especially but not only on your navigational headers) are copyrighted, but you don't fulfil their licenses' attribution requirements. Please either remove link= from the syntax embedding them or create an "image credits" subpage for each userpage using a copyrighted image this way.    FDMS  4    22:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi Royalmate1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:36, Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Singularity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Singularity, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

  • It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Administrators Abusing their Privileges

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Royalmate1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Unfairly blocked without warning

Decline reason:

Block looks fine to me. Challenging a block for personal attacks with personal attacks does not seem like a sound strategy. Kuru (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

March 2015

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for blatant insults and personal attacks; serious ownership issues. Wikipedia is not your personal webhost. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

So now it's a week? You have no business telling people who can and cannot edit this site. RoyalMate1 21:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

I extended RHaworth's 72 hour block after I saw this. Any unblock requests must include an assurance that you will not a) use Wikipedia as a webhost; b) You will not knowingly expose the project to legal action through copyright violations, and c) You will cease insulting and attacking people who are acting on the previous two issues, which are clearly delineated by Wikipedia policy and we all must follow whether we like them or not. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Block

I have blocked you for this edit.

Regarding "I may use wikipedua userpages in a manner I wish to" in an edit summary, this is most emphatically not true. We have a clear speedy deletion criterion: U5 - using Wikipedia as a free host. Your pages are just one massive violation of this rule. Ridiculously large pages consisting mainly of copy and pastes of Wikipedia articles having no relationship to the small number of mainspace edits that you are doing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • You're a fool and I hope you leave Wikipedia immediately. You're the cancer that is killing this site. Stop deleting my userpages or I will ask for you to be blocked from editing due to vandalism. Simply remove the copyrighted material. There is no precedent for not posting parts of articles in a userspace, and if there is, I do not recognize it. RoyalMate1 21:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PhantomTech (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Royalmate1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Unfairly blocked without warning; 2=I do not use Wikipedia for webspace storage. This is not my personal website. I don't plan to do this because I never was. I assure that I will not use Wikipedia as a webhost; b) I will not knowingly expose the project to legal action through copyright violations, and c) I will cease insulting and attacking people who are acting on the previous two issues, which are clearly delineated by Wikipedia policy and we all must follow whether we like them or not.

Decline reason:

Did you genuinely believe that blanking Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 February 27 - not just the entry regarding your pages, but everything - was helpful? I rather doubt that. You have accused everybody else of wrongdoing, and you have basically copied an "unblock request" someone else wrote for you, but I don't see you adressing your own conduct beyond a flat denial. Huon (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement

USVA headstone emb-11.svg Hello. I noticed you've made edits to articles related to the Latter Day Saint movement and thought you might be interested in participating in the WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. This project aims to serve as a hub for collaboration on elements of the Latter Day Saint movement, Mormonism, Latter Day Saint history, doctrine, practices, and other cultural effects inspired by Joseph Smith. You don't have to be a member of the Latter Day Saint movement to participate. Best wishes! RoyalMate1 22:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PhantomTech (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock me already

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Royalmate1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Some moron has put in a discussion about me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents because apparently I don't know about Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which is laughably dismissive. In order to discuss in any meaningful debate, I need to be able to edit the page. I may just ignore it anyway. RoyalMate1 01:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request, and have increased the block to indefinite. Edits like this one and your posting of an entire article from Newsweek on this page demonstrate either that you don't understand how copyright law applies to Wikipedia, or have no intention of obeying copyright law. Any further copyright violations on this page will result in your talk page access being revoked. Diannaa (talk) 02:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Now this is just a joke. You're clearly an idiot. I posted the reference which gave due credit to the Newsweek article. I question your capacity as an Administrator here and I demand that you rescind your "judgment" and my indefinite block which is a clear violation of WP policies. It's not a personal attack if it's true. RoyalMate1 02:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@Dianaaa - Since you clearly know nothing of copyright law or anything thereof, maybe you should have a look at this article: Copyright law of the United States. RoyalMate1 02:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Royalmate1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Admisitrators are placing undue blocks on me for their lack of udnetrstanding of WP polcies RoyalMate1 02:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for personal attacks. MER-C 03:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

So far, one administrator has blocked you, two have extended that block and two more have denied appeals. That's 5 different administrators who all agree that you should be blocked. If you genuinely believe that your block was not in line with policy I recommend describing why instead of just repeatedly accusing them of violating policy. PhantomTech (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikia

I presume you are user: Zeus MC who has had a brief existence on Wikia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)