User talk:Rrshaker

Self references

Hi Rrshaker. Thanks for expanding the landscape ecology, sustainability and sustainable development articles. One concern though - I noticed that you appear to be citing your own work in these articles. Self citation is often seen as promotional on Wikipedia; if at all possible, you should cite other people's work. Thanks. Guettarda (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Dear Guettarda Guettarda , I hope this response reaches you well. Although your opinion here on Wikipedia seems appropriate, yet I don't think you have any place to tell me where and what to cite on any of the aforementioned pages. Did you peer-review my scientific work? no! Did you have a problem with me self-citing my own work during those high-profile scientific publications? no! Are you an expert in any of these areas? no! Therefore, although you appear to be a relatively decent editor, please do look at how my own research is leading a paradigm shift at the nexus of landscape ecology and sustainability science. As Wikipedia is a 2.0 technology, if you have a problem with informing the global audience of cutting-edge scientific changes/work then you have the ability to change it. Note that I am using these examples and your response in all of my courses at University; expressing why Wikipedia will likely never be an appropriate information source for coursework. It would be better for you not to waste your time nor mine regarding the aforementioned. Lastly, based on your Wiki page, it appears that you are a conflict-driven person and I will be ignoring your tactics in the future. I have better things to do with my time than respond to you, and I hope you have better things to do than waste my time.

December 2023

Hello Rrshaker! Your additions to Natural Resources Forum have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 07:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

DEAR DUMBASS,

You're incorrect in your assumption. Through the link, which is in the public domain, you will find all the information provided to update this outdated wiki page.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14778947

Make the changes back to how I edited the page and/or shut the hell up and let people edit correctly who actually have editing experience.

Sadly disappointed,

Richard Ross Shaker, PhD

https://www.esf.edu/faculty/shaker/index.php

https://www.torontomu.ca/geography/about/people/shaker-richard/

Editorial boards:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/14778947/homepage/editorialboard.html

https://link.springer.com/journal/10668/editors?gclid=CjwKCAiAvoqsBhB9EiwA9XTWGeXw8duFSwsmCv9pmxqp-jKb49WYvYm9xaTqhPqMU-tH_SKIrbsnuxoCOuUQAvD_BwE

https://idjs.ca/en/editorial-submission-information Dr. R.R. Shaker 18:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Dr. R.R. Shaker 16:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

DEAR DUMBASS,

You're incorrect in your assumption. Through the link, which is in the public domain, you will find all the information provided to update this outdated wiki page.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14778947

Make the changes back to how I edited the page and/or shut the hell up and let people edit correctly who actually have editing experience.

Sadly disappointed,

Richard Ross Shaker, PhD

https://www.esf.edu/faculty/shaker/index.php

https://www.torontomu.ca/geography/about/people/shaker-richard/

Editorial boards:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/14778947/homepage/editorialboard.html

https://link.springer.com/journal/10668/editors?gclid=CjwKCAiAvoqsBhB9EiwA9XTWGeXw8duFSwsmCv9pmxqp-jKb49WYvYm9xaTqhPqMU-tH_SKIrbsnuxoCOuUQAvD_BwE

https://idjs.ca/en/editorial-submission-information Dr. R.R. Shaker 18:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
3. Update your signature to fix the error.
4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)