- Yes, I'll wait until most of the candidates have answered so they don't look at the rubric and write their answers. :P --Rschen7754 03:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Gotta say, it's quite amusing to see me get the same "civility" score as Off2riorob and Giano. I realize that's the metric you're using and there is an RFC out there started against me, but I just thought I'd call out the irony in being lumped in there.
On another note, if you're giving points out for just being an OTRS volunteer, I was approved earlier this week--I'd applied before nominating myself for ArbCom--and just managed to handle my first tickets today. Thanks for taking the time to try and provide metrics-based guidance for the community; it's obvious that you're trying to be as objective and comprehensive as possible. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 00:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Rschen7754. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate me and all the other candidates, and doing so in a fair and systematic way. I notice, however, that you give me 0 points for the additional experience area, while you note that serving on OTRS qualifies a candidate for points in that area. I have been on OTRS since May 2009. Your taking that into consideration is much appreciated. harej 19:16, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- In regards to both of your concerns: I have added Harej's points and Jclemens' The both of you are right on the bubble; I'm not bumping either of you to Support since the next highest is a whole 5% higher. (Iridescent has been bumped down to Neutral since you're pretty much all in the same category in terms of points). The curve's already been set, which makes this more difficult - usually you want to mention your OTRS experience in your statement anyway since it does look good for a candidate to have done this. --Rschen7754 00:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, in any case! harej 02:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)